<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.7600.16625"></HEAD>
<BODY style="MARGIN: 4px 4px 1px; FONT: 10pt Segoe UI">
<DIV>Hi</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>A point I didn't get across in my earlier post is that 9 times out 10 government institutions don't have the capacity to "manage" IS systems including GIS. It's fine using GIS to answer a set of questions but at the end of the day the answers that were found through analysis are not being fed back into the system for decision-making. This is where GIS falls short as the decision-makers within government do not have the answers to certain questions as these answers lie with the specialist that undertook the original analysis. If HODs and MECs were able to readily call up a map to see for example "How many rhino were poached over the last year and where these rhino were poached" or "where a provinces sensitive areas were and how these would affect a potential development" they would start seeing the benefit of a GIS and it would be easier to get budgets approved for a total GIS solution. We need experienced GIS professionals within government to take GIS forward. If GIS is to be taken seriously it cannot be left to a university leaver with very little experience to motivate for the total solution. From my experience they are not taken seriously, especially when you step on the toes of a IT manager who comes from a "Communications" background. If these government institutions had to employ a GIS professional to manage a GIS implementation, is there a sufficient resource base to full these positions. We know this is not the case and this has to be addressed.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Government departments are sold Enterprise GIS solutions without properly understanding that for these to run effectively and efficiently they need to be resourced with skilled staff and the necessary IT infrastructure (including adequate bandwidth). Often this does not happen and these total solutions never get off the ground. Management end up thinking that the money spent on the total GIS solution as being a total waste of funds. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Cheers</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Ray</DIV>
<DIV><BR>>>> "Walter Smit" <walter.s@sa-solutions.co.za> 05/06/2013 03:02 PM >>><BR>You answered your own question:<BR>The role of PLATO. "...in the FOSS environment it to have some certification<BR>for service providers".<BR><BR>PLATO registration attempts to ensure/prove to clients that the<BR>professionals they appoint/employ will have a broad skill set and give a<BR>certain level of service/expertise. If not, they can complain to Plato who<BR>can then take steps against the professional.<BR><BR>Would be great if most registered professionals came from the FOSS<BR>community.<BR><BR>Cheers<BR>W<BR><BR>-----Original Message-----<BR>From: africa-bounces@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:africa-bounces@lists.osgeo.org]<BR>On Behalf Of Gerhard Brits<BR>Sent: 05 June 2013 02:31 PM<BR>To: africa@lists.osgeo.org<BR>Subject: [OSGeo Africa] FOSS vs ESRI and other GIS issues<BR><BR>Hi All<BR><BR>I have been following this discussion trough out the morning. <BR><BR>What does it matter if you have a degree or a semester course in GIS. We<BR>have engineers that operate GIS applications. It is how you use GIS and the<BR>environment that you implement it that determines what educational<BR>background you need. In my short career in GIS have seen very few people<BR>that are competent that have some GIS degree or remote sensing background<BR>and register with PLATO, but they have no clue what it means to convert file<BR>types or to write a simple SQL query. So I do not understand even the role<BR>of PLATO. Does n programmer need to be registered with PLATO? Maybe it is<BR>just me being bias.<BR><BR>Government is a special place and very few GIS practitioners have the<BR>ability to influence how the IM/IT landscape is planned. The problem that we<BR>have in this world. The people that need to use systems do not have the<BR>ability to find solutions to problems themselves. So most government<BR>departments have put in large amount of money into developing staff to use a<BR>software. To change to open source platform causes a large amount of money<BR>to be spent to retrain people.<BR><BR>I think something we need to employ in the FOSS environment it to have some<BR>certification for service providers. So that government/business know that<BR>who they employee will deliver a professional and reliable service. Secondly<BR>IT/IM decision makers should be educated in what is available in the open<BR>source stack and how it can be used and the ease of use. GIS users should<BR>not be retrained but just moved to new platforms. <BR><BR>The way that the open source community is approaching business and<BR>government is wrong I believe. Do not force something and do not sell<BR>yourself on the basis that the software is free or very cheap. Sell yourself<BR>by showing how good it is, how scalable, and how simple it is to use. What<BR>type of support is available and how that support will be given to the<BR>client. <BR><BR>Regards<BR><BR>-----Original Message-----<BR>From: africa-bounces@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:africa-bounces@lists.osgeo.org]<BR>On Behalf Of africa-request@lists.osgeo.org<BR>Sent: 05 June 2013 01:20 PM<BR>To: africa@lists.osgeo.org<BR>Subject: Africa Digest, Vol 77, Issue 9<BR><BR>Send Africa mailing list submissions to<BR>africa@lists.osgeo.org<BR><BR>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<BR><A href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/africa">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/africa</A><BR>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<BR>africa-request@lists.osgeo.org<BR><BR>You can reach the person managing the list at<BR>africa-owner@lists.osgeo.org<BR><BR>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than<BR>"Re: Contents of Africa digest..."<BR><BR><BR>Today's Topics:<BR><BR> 1. FW: FOSS vs ESRI and other GIS issues (Walter Smit)<BR> 2. Re: FW: FOSS vs ESRI and other GIS issues (Llewellyn Gush)<BR><BR><BR>----------------------------------------------------------------------<BR><BR>Message: 1<BR>Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 12:19:27 +0200<BR>From: "Walter Smit" <walter.s@sa-solutions.co.za><BR>To: "Africa local chapter discussions" <africa@lists.osgeo.org><BR>Subject: [OSGeo Africa] FW: FOSS vs ESRI and other GIS issues<BR>Message-ID: <004e01ce61d6$2bce9ea0$836bdbe0$@sa-solutions.co.za><BR>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<BR><BR>Hi Ray<BR><BR>I have been physically deployed in a national government department (DRDLR)<BR>for the past 18months and many of your points are very true. I could write a<BR>whole essay about it, but here are some quick points.<BR><BR>* Training and inexperienced staff ? I have had to teach graduated<BR>GIS people (from various universities) what the difference is between files<BR>and folders. Seems to me that many universities are missing the plot<BR>completely on how to make young people ready for actual work.<BR><BR>* ?not programmers? ? true, but the FOSS software I have used does<BR>not require any more programming than over-the-counter suites.<BR><BR>* Enough PGPs? Correct, there are very few. It is however a fallacy<BR>that you need to be mentored by a PGP to be able to register with Plato (I<BR>was not ? and I didn?t get the benefit of the Grandfather clause either). I<BR>don?t know who started this lie, but it seems to stop people from even<BR>trying to register.<BR><BR>* I cannot comment on unscrupulous service providers ? solutions<BR>should be scalable.<BR><BR>* Freestate in the limelight ? I actually asked someone with more<BR>knowledge than the reporters. He was of the opinion that the service<BR>provider under quoted, because the range and scope of related services to<BR>that website was enormous. Like following several officials around to all<BR>their meetings for a year. <BR><BR>* Why pay more than once? Petty politics and leaders protecting their<BR>own little empires. And corruption of course. We have tried doing this for<BR>18months?no luck yet. Also the communication between provinces and levels of<BR>government is ludicrously poor. Do you know what your direct neighbours in<BR>Environmental Affairs are using? Hopefully Enrico and Nacelle will be<BR>uploading their Bioregional Plans to the sharing platform when they are<BR>done. The same platform where you can see the EIAs from NEIMS?*shameless<BR>plug*<BR><BR>* Data with known custodians. Have been doing this for 12months?it is<BR>very very difficult. Reasons: lack of high level regard for (spatial) data,<BR>capacity and attitudes of ?it isn?t in my job description?. Hopefully more<BR>OSD posts will change this. Remember that very few departments have ever<BR>taken responsibility for spatial data ? ever. It is a massively foreign<BR>concept to them. We are making good progress on this in 2 provinces. In the<BR>Northern Cape we have actually got all the HODs to sign MOUs that they will<BR>be custodians for their datasets. Appointing the actual person/post to an<BR>actual dataset is more of a challenge. <BR><BR>* GIS people in government. Lack of funding usually, or no GIS posts<BR>on their organograms. Government salaries for GIS people are actually much<BR>higher than private sector.<BR><BR>* IT support in government. Cannot comment on something that doesn?t<BR>exist :)<BR><BR>Personally I believe that departments would be better served by implementing<BR>FOSS and spending the saved money on training. Because training (regardless<BR>of software used) is what people really need. But then again?Tswane?why<BR>change a system if it is already working for them? And their staff have<BR>probably already had some decent training.<BR><BR>Rant over,<BR><BR><BR>Regards<BR><BR>Walter Smit<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>Professional GISc Practitioner SA (PGP 1193)<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>-------------- next part --------------<BR>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<BR>URL:<BR><<A href="http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/africa/attachments/20130605/21f1e088/attac">http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/africa/attachments/20130605/21f1e088/attac</A><BR>hment-0001.html><BR><BR>------------------------------<BR><BR>Message: 2<BR>Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 13:19:35 +0200<BR>From: Llewellyn Gush <llewellyn@jgdm.gov.za><BR>To: Africa local chapter discussions <africa@lists.osgeo.org>, Walter<BR>Smit <walter.s@sa-solutions.co.za><BR>Subject: Re: [OSGeo Africa] FW: FOSS vs ESRI and other GIS issues<BR>Message-ID: <51AF1EC7.9080809@jgdm.gov.za><BR>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<BR><BR>Hello Walt<BR><BR>Just read your RANT on OsGeo<BR><BR>Seems you may be changing your allegiance - to ESRI and all that ;-)<BR><BR>On a serious note the debate around the use of OSS has been doing the rounds<BR>in Gov now for longer than I care to remember. Nothing yet seems to have<BR>come of it, the reasons may be many and the will seems to be non existent,<BR>but one of the major stumbling blocks has been identified by yourself and<BR>the previous writer. This is not just about GIS though that is the primary<BR>focus of this forum. The whole debate is much broader and I think needs to<BR>have the profile raised.<BR><BR>It is really sad when a person considers themselves "computer literate"<BR>when they can use Word & Excel and then not even do Styles or formula's more<BR>complex than simple addition - they use them as a glorified typewriter. It<BR>is a fact that our educational institutions are doing a very poor job of<BR>skilling students to really be computer literate. This has come about mostly<BR>due to the penetration and exclusive use of a proprietary vendors solution,<BR>which was given to educational institutions for free (Catch them young and<BR>they are yours forever principle). I fail to understand why it is accepted<BR>that a single vendors solutions should be considered as the only<BR>contribution to a school/university curriculum. The education authorities<BR>carry equal blame in this regard<BR><BR>Your "low blow" about IT support in Gov :-(<BR><BR>I like to think that at the institution where I am employed there is a least<BR>a semblance of support. Suppose there has to be since OSS has been almost<BR>exclusively implemented in the server space, and what do you know "it works"<BR>and works well.<BR><BR>Free State...??? Maybe the reporter did not know the scope of the work, but<BR>neither did the department that wanted the solution. How many man hours can<BR>you buy for 40 Million? A hellava Lot!! Way more than the scope of work done<BR>so far.<BR><BR>And finally ...........DATA......... I would almost term this the Holy Grail<BR>of computing. Proprietary vendors, service providers etc are doing a really<BR>really good job of capturing data and then making it unavailable to the<BR>client. I have seen more than my fair share of projects that at the end the<BR>service provider walks away with the IP in the form of the data. I know that<BR>this is almost always the fault of the project managers, but am afraid that<BR>it all links back to the above re training and skills and knowledge about<BR>how to manage the data component.<BR><BR>YOU ARE SO RIGHT<BR><BR>Llewellyn<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>On 05/06/2013 12:19, Walter Smit wrote:<BR>><BR>> Hi Ray<BR>><BR>> I have been physically deployed in a national government department<BR>> (DRDLR) for the past 18months and many of your points are very true. I <BR>> could write a whole essay about it, but here are some quick points.<BR>><BR>> ? Training and inexperienced staff ? I have had to teach<BR>> graduated GIS people (from various universities) what the difference <BR>> is between files and folders. Seems to me that many universities are <BR>> missing the plot completely on how to make young people ready for <BR>> actual work.<BR>><BR>> ? ?not programmers? ? true, but the FOSS software I have used<BR>> does not require any more programming than over-the-counter suites.<BR>><BR>> ? Enough PGPs? Correct, there are very few. It is however a<BR>> fallacy that you need to be mentored by a PGP to be able to register <BR>> with Plato (I was not ? and I didn?t get the benefit of the <BR>> Grandfather clause either). I don?t know who started this lie, but it <BR>> seems to stop people from even trying to register.<BR>><BR>> ? I cannot comment on unscrupulous service providers ?<BR>> solutions should be scalable.<BR>><BR>> ? Freestate in the limelight ? I actually asked someone with<BR>> more knowledge than the reporters. He was of the opinion that the <BR>> service provider under quoted, because the range and scope of related <BR>> services to that website was enormous. Like following several <BR>> officials around to all their meetings for a year.<BR>><BR>> ? Why pay more than once? Petty politics and leaders protecting<BR>> their own little empires. And corruption of course. We have tried <BR>> doing this for 18months?no luck yet. Also the communication between <BR>> provinces and levels of government is ludicrously poor. Do you know <BR>> what your direct neighbours in Environmental Affairs are using?<BR>> Hopefully Enrico and Nacelle will be uploading their Bioregional Plans <BR>> to the sharing platform when they are done. The same platform where <BR>> you can see the EIAs from NEIMS?*shameless plug*<BR>><BR>> ? Data with known custodians. Have been doing this for<BR>> 12months?it is very very difficult. Reasons: lack of high level regard <BR>> for (spatial) data, capacity and attitudes of ?it isn?t in my job <BR>> description?. Hopefully more OSD posts will change this. Remember that <BR>> very few departments have ever taken responsibility for spatial data ?<BR>> ever. It is a massively foreign concept to them. We are making good <BR>> progress on this in 2 provinces. In the Northern Cape we have actually <BR>> got all the HODs to sign MOUs that they will be custodians for their <BR>> datasets. Appointing the actual person/post to an actual dataset is <BR>> more of a challenge.<BR>><BR>> ? GIS people in government. Lack of funding usually, or no GIS<BR>> posts on their organograms. Government salaries for GIS people are <BR>> actually much higher than private sector.<BR>><BR>> ? IT support in government. Cannot comment on something that<BR>> doesn?t exist J<BR>><BR>> Personally I believe that departments would be better served by <BR>> implementing FOSS and spending the saved money on training. Because <BR>> training (regardless of software used) is what people really need. But <BR>> then again?Tswane?why change a system if it is already working for <BR>> them? And their staff have probably already had some decent training.<BR>><BR>> Rant over,<BR>><BR>> _______________________________________________<BR>> Africa mailing list<BR>> Africa@lists.osgeo.org<BR>> <A href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/africa">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/africa</A><BR><BR>--<BR>Llewellyn Gush<BR>Information Technology Manager<BR>Joe Gqabi District Municipality<BR><BR><BR>-------------- next part --------------<BR>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<BR>URL:<BR><<A href="http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/africa/attachments/20130605/36f830e1/attac">http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/africa/attachments/20130605/36f830e1/attac</A><BR>hment.html><BR><BR>------------------------------<BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>Africa mailing list<BR>Africa@lists.osgeo.org<BR><A href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/africa">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/africa</A><BR><BR><BR>End of Africa Digest, Vol 77, Issue 9<BR>*************************************<BR><BR>I'm part of the 49Million initiative.<BR><A href="http://www.49Million.co.za">http://www.49Million.co.za</A> <BR><BR>NB: This Email and its contents are subject to the Eskom Holdings Limited<BR>EMAIL LEGAL NOTICE which can be viewed at<BR><A href="http://www.eskom.co.za/e-mail_legalnotice">http://www.eskom.co.za/e-mail_legalnotice</A><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>Africa mailing list<BR>Africa@lists.osgeo.org<BR><A href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/africa">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/africa</A><BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>Africa mailing list<BR>Africa@lists.osgeo.org<BR><A href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/africa">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/africa</A><BR></DIV><BR>
<p>
<b><font face="SansSerif">Disclaimer</font></b>
</p>
<p>
<font face="SansSerif">“This e-mail and any files transmitted with it
may contain information which is confidential, private or privilege in
nature and it is for the sole use of the recipient to whom it is
addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you must immediately
notify the sender via electronic mail and further refrain from reading,
disseminating, distributing, copying or using this message or any of its
transmitted files. Any views of this message and its transmitted files
are those of the sender unless the sender specifically states such views
to be those of the North-West Provincial Government. Though this message
and its transmitted files have been swept for the presence of computer
viruses, the North-West Provincial Government accepts no liability
whatsoever for any loss, damage or expenses resulting directly or
indirectly from the use or access of this message or any of its
transmitted files”</font>
</p>
</BODY></HTML>