[Aust-NZ] OSM Licensing

[Dan O'Hara]

Ditto on both your views of the copyrightable work and SA-style licence.
After much reading and thought I'm happy to fork - and my views made public.
Detectist





________________________________
From: Hamish <hamish_b at yahoo.com>
To: OSGeo NZ/AU <aust-nz at lists.osgeo.org>
Sent: Wed, 8 September, 2010 8:47:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Aust-NZ] OSM Licensing

fwiw, I consider my work on OSM to be a useful art- the map data is not
truth, a map is an abstract representation of reality. The cartographer
(or data entry monkey) can and does take a lot of artistic license in
designing and placing their data points, be it in the density of vertices
or the decision of what to include and what not to include.

the telephone number is not an abstraction of a telephone number, it /is/
the data. the page layout is the copyrightable thing there.

in this way the OSM database has a lot more copyrightable work in it than
say Google Map's satellite view (c) DigitalGlobe etc., who's only claim
to artistic work is the placement of the satellite and the elevation
correction algorithms.


also, without a ShareAlike-style license, for my part I doubt I'd bother
to contribute very much to OSM beyond perhaps fixing errors in my local
neighborhood to make backyard BBQ invites less confusing for my friends;
same as the corrections I've pushed upstream to Google Maps. I've little
interest in becoming an unpaid employee of MegaMap Int'l, Ltd.


2c,
Hamish



      
_______________________________________________
Aust-NZ mailing list
Aust-NZ at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/aust-nz



      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/aust-nz/attachments/20100908/36248940/attachment.html