<div dir="ltr">This is the option that we have the legal advice for. <br><br>As such we should continue what we originally agreed on and incorporate in WA.<br><br>(Brent, thanks for the attractive alternative. Let's keep it for plan B, in case something else goes wrong).<br>
<br><br>Tim,<br><br>I'm glad that you're back and have the time to contribute.<br><br>I'm now passing this back to you to resolve.<br><br>Bruce<br><br><br><br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Bruce Bannerman <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:B.Bannerman@bom.gov.au">B.Bannerman@bom.gov.au</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="Ih2E3d"><br>
<br>
<br></div><div class="Ih2E3d"><br>
><br>
</div>> The incorporated association gives the same limited liability<br>
> as Pty Ltd does. It is designed as a cheaper method of<br>
> achieving the same ends but is restricted to non profits. It<br>
> exists for a reason, and I think we should use it.<br>
><br>
> I'll dig out what I started for going down this path wrt WA<br>
> incorporation as that seemed to provide the most flexibility<br>
> at minimal cost. After that we only need to register with<br>
> ASIC to operate nationally.<br>
><br>
> Regards,<br>
> Tim Bowden<br>
<div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">><br></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>