[Benchmarking] Last minute vote: shall we switch to 6600
Smith, Michael ERDC-CRREL-NH
Michael.Smith at usace.army.mil
Wed Sep 1 15:24:50 EDT 2010
I vote + 0 for the same reason as Andrea.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Remote Sensing/GIS Center
On Sep 1, 2010, at 3:22 PM, Andrea Aime <aaime at opengeo.org> wrote:
> during today's meeting it was discussed that some servers
> are being disk bound during the tests, whilst others
> are not.
> I can't speak for others, but for GeoServer the difference
> between a disk bound run and one that is not is 5 to 10
> times (in terms of req/sec).
> So it was suggested that we adopt a setup that has
> 6600 different requests instead (see the other thread
> about it).
> What shall we do? Vote please.
> If we don't reach a consensus by the end of tomorrow
> we'll just stick with what we have (as it's late).
> +0 for me (meaning, I think it's a good idea but also
> that it's too late)
> Andrea Aime
> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
> Expert service straight from the developers.
> Benchmarking mailing list
> Benchmarking at lists.osgeo.org
More information about the Benchmarking