[Benchmarking] 2013 Shootout?

[Iván Sánchez Ortega]

On Martes, 9 de abril de 2013 14:35:14 Oliver Tonnhofer escribió:
> Tile servers are mostly just serving static files and all implementations
> should be able to push 1000 tile/s even on a small virtual server. This
> should be fine for 99.9% of all setups (even OSM peaks below 5000 tile/s).
> Need more performance? Put a varnish in front of it. Done. Things you
> can't do for WMS. So, that is IMO not really worth benchmarking.


I just want to see the throughtput of Mapserver servind WMS compared to the 
throughput of Mapproxy serving WMS on top of Mapserver serving WMS. No serving 
tiles involved anywhere, and I don't care about the caching internals.

And when I say "Mapserver WMS vs Mapproxy+Mapserver WMS" I also mean 
"Geoserver WMS vs GeoServer+Mapproxy WMS", "Cadcorp WMS vs Cadcorp+Mapproxy 
WMS", and so on.


Best,
-- 
Iván Sánchez Ortega <ivan at sanchezortega.es> <ivan at geonerd.org>