<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Re: [Benchmarking] Thoughts on 2010 exercise</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'>Jeff,<BR>
<BR>
That is our plan, longer term. We are in the middle of a server room remodel and we plan to have a new higher speed line run into the server room for purposes like these. We may upgrade the hardware but keep the installed data/software as is. Then we could rerun the benchmarks from 2009 to reset the baseline. I’m a little worried about the hardware longer term.<BR>
<BR>
Mike<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
-- <BR>
Michael Smith<BR>
RSGIS Center<BR>
US Army Corps of Engineers<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
On 11/25/09 11:21 AM, "Jeff McKenna" <<a href="jmckenna@gatewaygeomatics.com">jmckenna@gatewaygeomatics.com</a>> wrote:<BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT><BLOCKQUOTE><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'>Now that we're refreshed from FOSS4G2009 I just want to make sure that<BR>
we are ready for the demands of the 2010 exercise.<BR>
<BR>
I see 2010 having more participants, which means a higher demand on our<BR>
infrastructure.<BR>
<BR>
One part that must improve is the speed that we can upload and transfer<BR>
data to the benchmarking servers. Can we leave the benchmarking servers<BR>
where they are now but plug them into a faster line? Thoughts?<BR>
<BR>
-jeff<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
_______________________________________________<BR>
Benchmarking mailing list<BR>
<a href="Benchmarking@lists.osgeo.org">Benchmarking@lists.osgeo.org</a><BR>
<a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/benchmarking">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/benchmarking</a><BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>
</BODY>
</HTML>