<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Re: [Benchmarking] raster resampling question ?</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'>Mapserver is using Nearest Neighbor resampling.<BR>
<BR>
Mike<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
-- <BR>
Michael Smith<BR>
US Army Corps of Engineers<BR>
Remote Sensing/GIS Center<BR>
Hanover, NH <BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
On 8/31/10 8:43 AM, "Anne-Sophie Collignon" <<a href="Anne-Sophie.Collignon@erdas.com">Anne-Sophie.Collignon@erdas.com</a>> wrote:<BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT><BLOCKQUOTE><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'>Hi all,<BR>
<BR>
Question about the raster services : is that possible for each team to list what resampling options you’re using? Nearest neighbor, bilinear, etc?<BR>
Do you think we will be able to standardize on one or at least document each server? We have already noticed quite considerable quality differences amongst servers.<BR>
<BR>
Thank you,<BR>
Best Regards,<BR>
<BR>
Anne-Sophie<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>
</BODY>
</HTML>