<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Hello all<br>
<br>
Le 14/01/13 23:34, Herman Assink a écrit :<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:50F50685.2090900@IDgis.nl" type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
(...) First question is: Will there be a new WMS shootout? When,
at<br>
the FOSS4G conference in Nottingham? If yes, will the shootout
only<br>
consider performance of WMS solutions? We, deegree PSC members,
think<br>
that the comparison of WMS solutions should not only take
performance<br>
into account but also compare features such as the support of
optional<br>
items in the WMS standard.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
I would also like the comparisons to take in account the accuracy of
WMS solutions, for example by checking the pixel values after a
raster reprojection. If it is too difficult to determine what should
be an accurate result, then we could just measure the differences
between the result of different solutions (e.g. average difference
between pixel values, together with its standard deviation).<br>
<br>
Martin<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>