<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Hello Cameron<br>
<br>
Le 27/07/12 00:37, Cameron Shorter a écrit :<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:5011C699.1050403@gmail.com" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">I'd be interested to hear who voted
from the Geotools PSC, and their reasons for voting as they did.<br>
Are you able to point at the IRC logs, or email conversation?
Alternatively invite the people with concerns to air their
opinions.<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
There is the summary posted on the geotools-devel mailing list:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=29578915">http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=29578915</a><br>
I don't know if there is an IRC summary however...<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:5011C699.1050403@gmail.com" type="cite">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"> I think this question is likely to
become much bigger than just a geotools relicense, as with the
recent interest of Eclipse's location arm, LocationTech, there
will be other projects facing a similar decision.<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
I think it is true. However in this particular case, the
relationship that linked the 2 projects brought additional
considerations...<br>
<br>
Martin<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>