<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
My votes for motions:<br>
<br>
Accept minutes from last meeting<br>
+1 Cameron<br>
<br>
launch charter member election followed by board election ASAP, with
the goal of completing both before FOSS4G<br>
+1 Cameron<br>
<br>
authorize jmckenna to use money out of the strategic travel budget
for representing OSGeo as president in FOSS4G Portland (estimated to
3250$USD approx, to be reimbursed after upon presenting receipts<br>
+1 Cameron<br>
<br>
*to have the president attending the foss4g for free if the budget
permit his attendance with a maximum amount of money defined to 5000
US $*<br>
<br>
-0 as worded. I'm ok with the amount, but before approving, I'd like
to see a budget, a summary of what is expected to be achieved,
followed by receipts. We have some good processes in place for other
OSGeo spending, like the code sprint guidelines [1]. I suggest
something similar (but simpler) should be put in place to justify
travel.<br>
<br>
A starting point could be the OSGeo Advocate Expenses section [2].<br>
<br>
[1] <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Code_Sprint_Guidelines">http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Code_Sprint_Guidelines</a><br>
[2] <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Advocate#Expenses">http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Advocate#Expenses</a><br>
<br>
1. Have a plan <br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 18/07/2014 8:42 pm, Anne Ghisla
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:20140718124253.4c28bf9c@galadriel.localdomain"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hello all,
here are the minutes and logs of yesterday's Board meeting:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Board_Meeting_2014-07-17">http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Board_Meeting_2014-07-17</a>
(Minutes and motions are yet unapproved.)
There has been discussion over elections 2014, strategic funding, OSGeo
and Europe, and finally OSGeo's business model.
My comment is that this has been one of the (few) meetings where there
was less of the usual large consensus.
Therefore I feel important to get thoughts from OSGeo members other
than the current Board, as it is already happening in last emails. At
the moment we have no better way to collect opinions and comments
besides mailing lists and in-person discussions, that are notoriously
difficult to summarise. (A wiki page is good to summarise, but not to
discuss.) Nevertheless, I encourage members to speak up on these
important topics.
Best regards,
Anne
</pre>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Board mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Board@lists.osgeo.org">Board@lists.osgeo.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Cameron Shorter,
Software and Data Solutions Manager
LISAsoft
Suite 112, Jones Bay Wharf,
26 - 32 Pirrama Rd, Pyrmont NSW 2009
P +61 2 9009 5000, W <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.lisasoft.com">www.lisasoft.com</a>, F +61 2 9009 5099</pre>
</body>
</html>