<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    As Bart mentioned,<br>
    * After initially being written, the letter was sent to OSGeo
    standards list, asking for review.<br>
    * Suchith sent to OGC TC-Discuss list for review, and ESRI
    responded.<br>
    * After ~ 1 week for review, the letter was forwarded to OSGeo
    discuss and a few others, asking for signatures (we have ~ 70
    signatures, growing every day)<br>
    * As per this email thread below, I've asked OSGeo board's approval
    to officially present this letter.<br>
    * Today I've had inquiries from mass media. I've asked them to hold
    off on breaking the story until the board gives approval to
    officially present the letter, which will add extra weight to the
    letter. They didn't publish today, but may publish in 12 to 48
    hours. (Media organisations have a strong desire to be the first to
    publish).<br>
    <br>
    So now the board has had time to consider, can you please all vote
    on following 2 proposals:<br>
    <br>
    I request the board support an OSGeo Community developed Open<br
      class="">
           Letter aimed at protecting open LiDAR standards.<br class="">
           <a moz-do-not-send="true"
      href="http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/LIDAR_Format_Letter" class="">http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/LIDAR_Format_Letter</a><br
      class="">
    <br class="">
           Proposal 1: The OSGeo Board agree to include the following<br
      class="">
           statement (or similar wording) into the letter:<br class="">
    <br class="">
           = Cover Letter from the OSGeo Board =<br class="">
    <br class="">
           The board of the [<a moz-do-not-send="true"
      href="http://osgeo.org" class="">http://osgeo.org</a> <<a
      moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://osgeo.org/" class="">http://osgeo.org/</a>>
    Open<br class="">
           Source Geospatial Foundation] (OSGeo) is presenting this<br
      class="">
           letter to the OGC, ESRI and ASPRS. The letter highlights<br
      class="">
           concerns about fragmentation in LiDAR standards from many<br
      class="">
           people within the OSGeo community. As always, if there is<br
      class="">
           anything the OSGeo board can do to help, then please let us
    know.<br class="">
    <br class="">
           Signed: <OSGeo Board Members><br class="">
    <br class="">
           Proposal 2:<br class="">
           Once the letter has completed the signature phase, the letter<br
      class="">
           be emailed from the OSGeo President to key people within
    these<br class="">
           organisations:<br class="">
    <br class="">
           Mark Reichardt <mreichardt AT <a moz-do-not-send="true"
      href="http://opengeospatial.org" class="">opengeospatial.org</a><br
      class="">
           <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
      href="http://opengeospatial.org" class="">http://opengeospatial.org</a>>>,
    OSGeo President<br class="">
           David Danko <DDanko AT <a moz-do-not-send="true"
      href="http://esri.com" class="">esri.com</a> <<a
      moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://esri.com" class="">http://esri.com</a>>>,
    ESRI's<br class="">
           Senior Consultant for GIS Standards<br class="">
           Stephen D. DeGloria < sdd4 AT <a moz-do-not-send="true"
      href="http://cornell.edu" class="">cornell.edu</a><br class="">
           <<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://cornell.edu"
      class="">http://cornell.edu</a>>>, President of the ASPRS<br
      class="">
    <br class="">
    <br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 20/04/2015 10:50 pm, Bart van den
      Eijnden wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote cite="mid:712C1DD9-7C4C-45B8-BA3A-EDD3447EAB6C@osgis.nl"
      type="cite">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
        charset=windows-1252">
      Jeff,
      <div class=""><br class="">
      </div>
      <div class="">this was sent to discuss 1 week ago [1]. It has also
        been sent to the OGC TC-Discuss list where Esri has even
        responded.</div>
      <div class=""><br class="">
      </div>
      <div class="">[1]</div>
      <div class=""><a moz-do-not-send="true"
          href="http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/2015-April/014137.html"
          class="">http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/2015-April/014137.html</a></div>
      <div class=""><br class="">
      </div>
      <div class="">Best regards,</div>
      <div class="">Bart</div>
      <div class=""><br class="">
        <div>
          <blockquote type="cite" class="">
            <div class="">On 20 Apr 2015, at 14:44, Jeff McKenna <<a
                moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:jmckenna@gatewaygeomatics.com" class="">jmckenna@gatewaygeomatics.com</a>>
              wrote:</div>
            <br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
            <div class="">That would be good Maxi, as my concern is
              getting community feedback before the Board reviews such a
              request.<br class="">
              <br class="">
              Has this letter been sent yet to the general OSGeo
              community for review?  (the Discuss list) I think it is
              great that the Standards group reviewed it, maybe now it
              is ready for the general OSGeo community.<br class="">
              <br class="">
              <br class="">
              -jeff<br class="">
              <br class="">
              <br class="">
              <br class="">
              On 2015-04-20 6:18 AM, Massimiliano Cannata wrote:<br
                class="">
              <blockquote type="cite" class="">Thare are interesting
                discussions running on the italian chapter list.<br
                  class="">
                It would be nice if someone could wrap-up a short
                summary of interesting<br class="">
                points.<br class="">
                <br class="">
                I could do it in the next days if none is available.<br
                  class="">
                <br class="">
                Maxi<br class="">
                <br class="">
                2015-04-20 10:30 GMT+02:00 Jachym Cepicky <<a
                  moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:jachym.cepicky@gmail.com" class="">jachym.cepicky@gmail.com</a><br
                  class="">
                <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:jachym.cepicky@gmail.com" class="">mailto:jachym.cepicky@gmail.com</a>>>:<br
                  class="">
                <br class="">
                   I'm fine with that<br class="">
                <br class="">
                   pá 17. 4. 2015 v 8:56 odesílatel Bart van den Eijnden<br
                  class="">
                   <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:bartvde@osgis.nl" class="">bartvde@osgis.nl</a>
                <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:bartvde@osgis.nl" class="">mailto:bartvde@osgis.nl</a>>>
                napsal:<br class="">
                <br class="">
                       Hello board,<br class="">
                <br class="">
                       do people still need time to comment on the
                letter or can we<br class="">
                       call for a motion on this?<br class="">
                <br class="">
                       Best regards,<br class="">
                       Bart<br class="">
                <br class="">
                <blockquote type="cite" class="">        On 16 Apr 2015,
                  at 13:52, Cameron Shorter<br class="">
                         <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="mailto:cameron.shorter@gmail.com" class="">cameron.shorter@gmail.com</a>
                  <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="mailto:cameron.shorter@gmail.com" class="">mailto:cameron.shorter@gmail.com</a>>><br
                    class="">
                         wrote:<br class="">
                  <br class="">
                         Hi OSGeo Board,<br class="">
                  <br class="">
                         I request the board support an OSGeo Community
                  developed Open<br class="">
                         Letter aimed at protecting open LiDAR
                  standards.<br class="">
                         <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/LIDAR_Format_Letter"
                    class="">http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/LIDAR_Format_Letter</a><br
                    class="">
                  <br class="">
                         Proposal 1: The OSGeo Board agree to include
                  the following<br class="">
                         statement (or similar wording) into the letter:<br
                    class="">
                  <br class="">
                         = Cover Letter from the OSGeo Board =<br
                    class="">
                  <br class="">
                         The board of the [<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="http://osgeo.org" class="">http://osgeo.org</a>
                  <<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://osgeo.org/"
                    class="">http://osgeo.org/</a>> Open<br class="">
                         Source Geospatial Foundation] (OSGeo) is
                  presenting this<br class="">
                         letter to the OGC, ESRI and ASPRS. The letter
                  highlights<br class="">
                         concerns about fragmentation in LiDAR standards
                  from many<br class="">
                         people within the OSGeo community. As always,
                  if there is<br class="">
                         anything the OSGeo board can do to help, then
                  please let us know.<br class="">
                  <br class="">
                         Signed: <OSGeo Board Members><br class="">
                  <br class="">
                         Proposal 2:<br class="">
                         Once the letter has completed the signature
                  phase, the letter<br class="">
                         be emailed from the OSGeo President to key
                  people within these<br class="">
                         organisations:<br class="">
                  <br class="">
                         Mark Reichardt <mreichardt AT <a
                    moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="http://opengeospatial.org" class="">opengeospatial.org</a><br
                    class="">
                         <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="http://opengeospatial.org" class="">http://opengeospatial.org</a>>>,
                  OSGeo President<br class="">
                         David Danko <DDanko AT <a
                    moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://esri.com"
                    class="">esri.com</a> <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="http://esri.com" class="">http://esri.com</a>>>,
                  ESRI's<br class="">
                         Senior Consultant for GIS Standards<br class="">
                         Stephen D. DeGloria < sdd4 AT <a
                    moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://cornell.edu"
                    class="">cornell.edu</a><br class="">
                         <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="http://cornell.edu" class="">http://cornell.edu</a>>>,
                  President of the ASPRS<br class="">
                  <br class="">
                  <br class="">
                         On 11/04/2015 12:14 pm, Cameron Shorter wrote:<br
                    class="">
                  <blockquote type="cite" class="">        Hi all,<br
                      class="">
                           A number of us have been collaboratively
                    developing an Open<br class="">
                           Letter asking key stakeholders to avoid
                    fragmentation in<br class="">
                           LiDAR standards.<br class="">
                    <br class="">
                           It starts:<br class="">
                           /We, the undersigned, are concerned that the
                    current<br class="">
                           interoperability between LiDAR applications,
                    through use of<br class="">
                           the open "LAS" format, is being threatened by
                    ESRI's<br class="">
                           introduction and promotion of an alternative
                    "Optimized LAS"<br class="">
                           proprietary format. This is of concern since
                    the<br class="">
                           fragmentation of the LAS format will lead to
                    reduced<br class="">
                           interoperability between applications and
                    organisations, and<br class="">
                           introduce vendor lock-in./<br class="">
                    <br class="">
                           Could all interested please:<br class="">
                           1. Review and provide feedback to this
                    standards email list<br class="">
                           2. If you agree with the letter, please add
                    your name to the<br class="">
                           "Signed" section<br class="">
                    <br class="">
                           --<br class="">
                           Cameron Shorter,<br class="">
                           Software and Data Solutions Manager<br
                      class="">
                           LISAsoft<br class="">
                           Suite 112, Jones Bay Wharf,<br class="">
                           26 - 32 Pirrama Rd, Pyrmont NSW 2009<br
                      class="">
                    <br class="">
                           P +61 2 9009 5000,  <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="http://Wwww.lisasoft.com" class="">Wwww.lisasoft.com</a>
                     <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="http://www.lisasoft.com/" class="">http://www.lisasoft.com/</a>>,
                     F +61 2 9009 5099<br class="">
                  </blockquote>
                  <br class="">
                </blockquote>
              </blockquote>
              _______________________________________________<br
                class="">
              Board mailing list<br class="">
              <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:Board@lists.osgeo.org" class="">Board@lists.osgeo.org</a><br
                class="">
              <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board</a><br class="">
            </div>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <br class="">
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Board mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Board@lists.osgeo.org">Board@lists.osgeo.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board</a></pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
Cameron Shorter,
Software and Data Solutions Manager
LISAsoft
Suite 112, Jones Bay Wharf,
26 - 32 Pirrama Rd, Pyrmont NSW 2009

P +61 2 9009 5000,  W <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.lisasoft.com">www.lisasoft.com</a>,  F +61 2 9009 5099</pre>
  </body>
</html>