Sure!<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Tyler Mitchell (OSGeo) <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tmitchell@osgeo.org">tmitchell@osgeo.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">George Silva wrote:<br>
> I guess we could use some sort of UML or something<br>
> near that to arrange all our ideas too. I'm not sure if everyone likes<br>
> UML, but it helps me think and it's a great form of documenting. If<br>
> anyone can suggest another, please do.<br>
<br>
</div>I'm hoping we can stick with a simple list of properties with too much<br>
inner complexity needing diagramming. If we need we could do up an XML<br>
schema style document right in the wiki - would that be reasonable?<br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>George R. C. Silva<br><br>Desenvolvimento em GIS<br><a href="http://blog.geoprocessamento.net">http://blog.geoprocessamento.net</a><br>