<div dir="ltr">Thanks, Rob! <br><br>If you know of any other resources or have any recent/relevant forum or OSGeo experience that would inform these two tasks that'd be great!<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Rob Emanuele <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rdemanuele@gmail.com" target="_blank">rdemanuele@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><p dir="ltr">Chiming in just to say, +1 on those two suggested next steps. </p>
<p dir="ltr">I'm not sure if anyone would take issue with using Google forms as opposed to an open source reporting system run on OSGeo infrastructure (given the recent discussions on OSGeo-Discuss about code hosting), but I think that the ease of use for Google forms would make it a great choice.</p>
<p dir="ltr">The article on enforcement is very thorough, and I think it provides a good method to approach enforcement in a reasoned and de-escalating way. The line "Generally conference staff are not equipped for evidence gathering: we suggest not going around and "interviewing" others involved." The enforcers are not detectives or the police, and it makes sense that the sole focus of any actions would be "<b>the safety of your community members from harassment</b>".</p>
<p dir="ltr">-Rob</p>
<div style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div class="h5"><div dir="ltr"><p dir="ltr">Thanks, Cameron.</p>
<p dir="ltr">We are not looking to make any changes to the CoC at this point. Our job is to: <br><br></p><ol><li>put together process around how members can submit reports of CoC violations</li><li>create specific guidance for LOCs, moderators and the board about how to deal with those reports and reporters. <br></li></ol><p>We put together a list of places to start here - <a href="http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/CodeofConduct_Documents#Resources" target="_blank">http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/CodeofConduct_Documents#Resources</a></p><p>I suggest we:</p><ol><li>use this form as a starting point for Task #1 - <a href="https://www.drupal.org/governance/community-working-group/incident-report" target="_blank">https://www.drupal.org/governance/community-working-group/incident-report</a> (not sure if its ok to use Google Forms, that's what <a href="http://drupal.org" target="_blank">drupal.org</a> uses) <br></li><li>start an Enforcement page (useful info here <a href="http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Conference_anti-harassment/Responding_to_reports" target="_blank">http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Conference_anti-harassment/Responding_to_reports</a> )</li></ol><p>What do you think? Is anyone else out there? if so, please chime in! <br></p><p>Camille</p><div class="gmail_quote">On Oct 16, 2015 6:57 PM, "Cameron Shorter" <<a href="mailto:cameron.shorter@gmail.com" target="_blank">cameron.shorter@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Hi all,<br>
I've drafted a suggested amendment to our CoC to help us answer the
question of what is/is not in scope of a CoC breach.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Code_Of_Conduct#Classification_Context" target="_blank">http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Code_Of_Conduct#Classification_Context</a><br>
<br>
<h3 style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-weight:bold;margin:0px 0px 0.3em;padding-top:0.5em;padding-bottom:0.17em;border-bottom-style:none;font-size:16.764px;font-family:sans-serif;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;letter-spacing:normal;line-height:19.05px;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background:rgb(255,255,255) none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><span>Classification
Context</span></h3>
<p style="margin:0.4em 0px 0.5em;line-height:19.05px;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12.7px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)"><span style="color:red">This additional section proposed
for version 2.0:</span></p>
<p style="margin:0.4em 0px 0.5em;line-height:19.05px;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12.7px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)">As guidance, content should align with a film
classification of: 12+ or PG or similar. There are many<span> </span><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Television_content_rating_systems" rel="nofollow" style="text-decoration:none;color:rgb(51,102,187);padding-right:16px;background:transparent url("http://wiki.osgeo.org/skins/monobook/lock_icon.gif") no-repeat scroll 100% 50%" target="_blank">country classifications</a>. To remove ambiguity, we
refer to the<span> </span><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Classification_Board#Film_and_video_game_classifications" rel="nofollow" style="text-decoration:none;color:rgb(51,102,187);padding-right:16px;background:transparent url("http://wiki.osgeo.org/skins/monobook/lock_icon.gif") no-repeat scroll 100% 50%" target="_blank">Australian PG Classification</a>:</p>
<ul style="line-height:19.05px;list-style-type:square;margin:0.3em 0px 0px 1.5em;padding:0px;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12.7px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)">
<li style="margin-bottom:0.1em"><i><b>Parental Guidance (PG)</b></i><span> </span>– Not recommended for
viewing or playing by people under 15 without guidance from
parents or guardians. Contains material that young viewers may
find confusing or upsetting. The content is mild in impact.
<ul style="line-height:1.5em;list-style-type:square;margin:0.3em 0px 0px 1.5em;padding:0px">
<li style="margin-bottom:0.1em"><b>Violence</b><span> </span>should be mild and
infrequent, and should be presented in "a stylised or
theatrical fashion, or in an historical context".</li>
<li style="margin-bottom:0.1em"><b>Themes</b><span> </span>should have a "mild
sense of menace or threat" and be "discreet"</li>
<li style="margin-bottom:0.1em"><b>Frightening or Intense
Scenes</b><span> </span>should
be "mildly frightening" and have "low intensity"</li>
<li style="margin-bottom:0.1em"><b>Crude Humor</b><span> </span>should be "mild" or
"low level"</li>
<li style="margin-bottom:0.1em"><b>Sex, nudity and drug use</b><span> </span>should be mild,
infrequent, "discreetly implied" and "justified by context".</li>
<li style="margin-bottom:0.1em"><b>Coarse language</b><span> </span>should be mild and
infrequent, and be justified by context.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<br>
<br>
<div>On 16/10/2015 6:38 am, Cameron Shorter
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div style="overflow:hidden"><br>
One thing I've been pondering since seeing the first
few questions about<br>
CoC being discussed is how to "classify" what is
considered a CoC<br>
breach. I'm yet to see any hard guidelines as to what
is/is not<br>
acceptable. (And this sucks up large amounts of
bandwidth on email lists).<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>You did good research on this for FOSS4G CoC so it'd
be great if you could get the ball rolling here! <br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
Ok, I'll start looking into it.<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div style="overflow:hidden"> <br>
Looking around for what we can borrow as a standard
reference, I wonder<br>
whether we can borrow from film classifications:<br>
<br>
I'm familiar with the Australian classifications
(being an Australian<br>
myself), which are well defined:<br>
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Classification_Board#Film_and_video_game_classifications" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Classification_Board#Film_and_video_game_classifications</a></div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
<pre cols="72">--
Cameron Shorter,
Software and Data Solutions Manager
LISAsoft
Suite 112, Jones Bay Wharf,
26 - 32 Pirrama Rd, Pyrmont NSW 2009
P <a href="tel:%2B61%202%209009%205000" value="+61290095000" target="_blank">+61 2 9009 5000</a>, W <a href="http://www.lisasoft.com" target="_blank">www.lisasoft.com</a>, F <a href="tel:%2B61%202%209009%205099" value="+61290095099" target="_blank">+61 2 9009 5099</a></pre>
</div>
</blockquote></div>
</div>
<br></div></div>_______________________________________________<br>
COC-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:COC-discuss@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">COC-discuss@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/coc-discuss" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/coc-discuss</a><br>
<br></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>