[OSGeo-Conf] 2009 Vote required

[venka.osgeo]

+1

Steve Lime wrote:
> +1
> 
>>>> On 1/29/2008 at 11:03 AM, in message <479F5C54.6050908 at dmsolutions.ca>, Jeff
> McKenna <jmckenna at dmsolutions.ca> wrote:
>> Hello fellow OSGeo conference committee members,
>>
>> I would like to thank those who were able to attend last week's 
>> conference call with the Sydney bidding committee.  Major topics such as 
>> the proposed team, budget, venue, and accommodation were all discussed. 
>>     For those topics that were a little unclear for the bidding team at 
>> this stage (such as handling workshops) it was agreed that there is 
>> sufficient time to deal with these before 2009.
>>
>> The next step in the process for deciding on a 2009 location must be a 
>> vote by the OSGeo conference committee, and then this proposed location 
>> must be approved by the OSGeo Board members.  The next board meeting is 
>> next Friday February 8th, where the plan is to present our committee 
>> decision to the board.
>>
>> Therefore we must still vote on the one submitted bid.  Usually we would 
>> do the voting privately, but considering the circumstances I think it 
>> should be optional this year - if prefer to keep your voting private you 
>> can email me directly your vote, otherwise we can all use this mailing 
>> list.  Please use "+1" to indicate you support the Sydney bid, "0" for 
>> no opinion, and "-1" for disagreement.  Please submit your votes before 
>> next Friday.
>>
>> I'll start with a +1.  (their passion and enthusiasm for FOSS4G is 
>> evident, and they have a strong team)
>>
>>
>> -jeff
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> 2009 proposal: http://www.osgeo.org/conference/rfp 
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Conference_dev mailing list
>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org 
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Conference_dev mailing list
> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>