<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">+1 from me<br class=""><div class="">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; ">______<br class="">Steven<br class=""><br class=""></span>
</div>
<br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On 7 Sep 2015, at 23:50, Eli Adam <<a href="mailto:eadam@co.lincoln.or.us" class="">eadam@co.lincoln.or.us</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class="">Conference Committee members, could you please voice an opinion on<br class="">this proposed agreement (or specific comments)?<br class=""><br class=""><a href="https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/browser/foss4g/2016/financial_stuff/agreement_with_osgeo/Agreement-between-OSGeo-and-FOSSGISeV-2016.pdf" class="">https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/browser/foss4g/2016/financial_stuff/agreement_with_osgeo/Agreement-between-OSGeo-and-FOSSGISeV-2016.pdf</a><br class=""><br class="">+1 from me.<br class=""><br class="">Thanks, Eli<br class=""><br class="">On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 7:08 AM, <till.adams@fossgis.de> wrote:<br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">Hi Gert-Jan,<br class=""><br class="">yes, we have an PCO, but as we as FOSSGIS e.V. are a legal entity on our<br class="">own, there is no need to include our PCO in this agreement. PCO is just<br class="">contracted thruogh FOSSGIS later. This was in some earlier cases different,<br class="">as OCL didn't have any legal entity.<br class=""><br class="">So far, Till<br class=""><br class=""><br class=""><br class="">Am 2015-09-04 15:32, schrieb geejee@dds.nl:<br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><br class="">Although not my primary cup-of-tea one comment:<br class="">The agreement says it determines the "arrangements between the LOC<br class="">and/or PCO and OSGeo". My interpretation from that sentence is that<br class="">there are apparantly 3 parties involved (LOC, PCO, OSgeo). However,<br class="">just above this text there are only 2 parties identified (OSGeo and<br class="">FOSSGIS e.V., the LOC).<br class=""><br class="">Of course the parties involved will have a clue about what the POC<br class="">is, but in formal contract (as this document is supposed to be) I'd<br class="">explain the POC-role is one or two sentences.<br class=""><br class=""><br class="">Regards,<br class=""><br class="">Gert-Jan<br class=""><br class=""><br class=""><br class=""><br class=""><br class="">till.adams@fossgis.de schreef:<br class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">Hi,<br class=""><br class="">just my comments:<br class=""><br class=""><br class="">The 85% are prposed for the template, which should be used every year<br class="">from now on. So any LOC has to refund at least 85% of the outcome to OSGeo.<br class="">The 90% are our specific offer to OSGeo, so that's specialized for the LOC<br class="">2016.<br class="">Maybe there are some local chapters, that are happy to have the<br class="">opportunity to get some money from a very likely outcome of a FOSS4G.<br class="">For us, FOSSGIS e.V. (which is the legal entity behind LOC 2016) we do<br class="">not need some % of the outcome, because we have our own conference and with<br class="">that our own income.<br class=""><br class="">I asked myself about the 30 days, but thought, okay, that seed-money must<br class="">be on our account after conference. But the way you wrote it is fine also.<br class=""><br class="">Just my notes,<br class="">regards, Till<br class=""><br class=""><br class=""><br class="">Am 2015-09-03 20:26, schrieb Eli Adam:<br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><br class="">On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Jeff McKenna<br class=""><jmckenna@gatewaygeomatics.com> wrote:<br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><br class="">Many issues with that PDF (thanks GoogleDocs). I fixed them (ended up<br class="">creating a new empty document and renaming, yikes). Here are correct<br class="">links:<br class=""><br class=""></blockquote><br class="">Thanks for fixing.<br class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><br class="">pdf:<br class=""><br class=""><br class=""><br class="">http://svn.osgeo.org/osgeo/foss4g/2016/financial_stuff/agreement_with_osgeo/Agreement-between-OSGeo-and-FOSSGISeV-2016.pdf<br class=""><br class="">odt:<br class=""><br class=""><br class=""><br class="">http://svn.osgeo.org/osgeo/foss4g/2016/financial_stuff/agreement_with_osgeo/Agreement-between-OSGeo-and-FOSSGISeV-2016.odt<br class=""><br class=""><br class="">-jeff<br class=""><br class=""><br class=""><br class=""><br class=""><br class="">On 2015-09-03 12:15 PM, Steven Feldman wrote:<br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><br class=""><br class="">I have drafted an agreement between OSGeo and FOSSGIS eV re finance<br class="">for<br class="">FOSS4G 2016. See<br class=""></blockquote></blockquote><br class=""><br class="">Thanks for putting this together.<br class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><br class=""><br class=""><br class=""><br class="">https://svn.osgeo.org/osgeo/foss4g/2016/financial_stuff/agreement_with_osgeo/DraftagreementbetweenOSGeoandaFOSS4GLOC.pdf<br class="">Till and I have gone through it, made a couple of improvements and we<br class="">are both happy with it.<br class=""><br class="">The next step is for the conference committee to either approve it or<br class="">suggest amendments.<br class=""></blockquote></blockquote><br class=""><br class="">In one spot it said 85%, in another 90%. I've change it to 90% in<br class="">both places, https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/changeset/12516/. If they<br class="">should both be 85% then we can change it back.<br class=""><br class="">Pertaining to "9. The Advance will be repaid to OSGeo by the LOC<br class="">within 30 days of the end of the Event", that sort of conflicts with<br class="">the whole agreement. The agreement is that OSGeo may not get the 50K<br class="">back as well as possibly lose another 50k. Also, I don't see anything<br class="">like that getting done in 30 days (looking at past years, 6 months<br class="">seems like the average). I think that something to the effect of, "9.<br class="">The LOC will provide a written report on financial accounting<br class="">detailing balance of revenues and expenses and outstanding<br class="">indeterminates within 30 days of the event. Based on availability,<br class="">arrangement will be made to repay the seed money promptly and the rest<br class="">of any surplus on a later timeline." is more realistic.<br class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">Can you give feedback before Monday morning?<br class=""></blockquote></blockquote><br class=""><br class="">Monday is a holiday in the US. Tuesday morning may be a more<br class="">reasonable deadline for some US people (but they also have today and<br class="">tomorrow).<br class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">Assuming there are no major objections I suggest that Eli as Chair of<br class="">the Conference Committee submits to the Board as a recommendation for<br class="">them to vote on.<br class=""></blockquote></blockquote><br class=""><br class="">Once we have this done, I'll add it to the Board agenda and notify the<br class="">Board of our recommendation.<br class=""><br class="">Thanks, Eli<br class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><br class="">Phew, that was more work than I had imagined<br class="">______<br class="">Steven<br class=""><br class=""></blockquote>_______________________________________________<br class="">Conference_dev mailing list<br class="">Conference_dev@lists.osgeo.org<br class="">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev<br class=""></blockquote><br class="">_______________________________________________<br class="">Conference_dev mailing list<br class="">Conference_dev@lists.osgeo.org<br class="">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev<br class=""></blockquote><br class=""><br class="">_______________________________________________<br class="">Conference_dev mailing list<br class="">Conference_dev@lists.osgeo.org<br class="">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev<br class=""></blockquote></blockquote><br class=""><br class="">_______________________________________________<br class="">Conference_dev mailing list<br class="">Conference_dev@lists.osgeo.org<br class="">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev<br class=""></blockquote>_______________________________________________<br class="">Conference_dev mailing list<br class="">Conference_dev@lists.osgeo.org<br class="">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev<br class=""></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></body></html>