<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif"><p class="MsoNormal" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px"><i>Full disclosure, I will be the incoming Conference Chair for the Global FOSS4G 2017 event to be held in Boston from August 14-18, 2017.</i></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px"><i> </i></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px">As promised, I’m back from holiday and have been able to better synch with our BLOC and would like to take the opportunity to more fully and formally reply to this important thread. Thanks are in order to Andrea for bringing this serious issue forward for discussion; indeed, there should be a common understanding of if/how Global and North American events should be “coordinated” when the international rotation brings the Global event to North America.</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px"> </p><p class="MsoNormal" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px">Ultimately, we do hope and urge that a springtime FOSS4GNA event does <i>not</i> happen in 2017. The following provides the thinking behind this position.</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px"> </p><p class="MsoNormal" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px">In re-reading the thread just about everything I was intending to write has been posted by someone, or another. Ultimately, this thread is a reminder of what’s best and powerful about the OSGeo/FOSS4G community. The discussions may be imperfect in some ways, but they are always open, thoughtful and reflect a desire for consensus. And indeed, it seems a consensus is potentially forming on this topic.</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px"> </p><p class="MsoNormal" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px">First, a quick listing of opinions from other writers that we share:</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px"></p><ul style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px"><li style="margin-left:15px">+1 to Rob Emanuel’s observation that this is a time to avoid “any force of schism” and that rather 2017 is a huge opportunity for the community “to come together”.</li><li style="margin-left:15px">+1 to Cameron Shorter’s very concise enumeration of what several people echoed in other posts: “two major FOSS4G events in the same country would weaken both events.”</li><li style="margin-left:15px">+1 to several writers who observed that precedent holds that regional events generally cede to the Global event when it is on the same continent (e.g., there was no FOSS4GNA in 2014 in lieu of Portland; no FOSS4G Asia in 2015 in lieu of Seoul; and no FOSS4G EU in 2016 in lieu of Bonn) with the few exceptions being for non-English language regional conferences.</li><li style="margin-left:15px">+1 to Randy Hale’s clear enumeration of the small business-person’s, or independent attendee’s dilemma, in having only so much time or budget available and needing to choose one, or the other, if there were two events.</li><li style="margin-left:15px">+1 to both Robert Cheetham’s and Jody Garnett's superb ideas on seeing an opportunity for new, focused types of geo open source events that can complement the bigger FOSS4G and FOSS4GNA events (e.g., Civic oriented open source; Big geo data oriented open source; etc.)</li></ul><p style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px"></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px">With these things said, I’d also like to address a couple of the additional points that Andrea referenced in her post from <font color="#000000">last Friday, Feb. 19.</font></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px"></p><ul style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px"><li style="margin-left:15px">It is terrific that FOSS4GNA 2015 achieved such a great participation rate from women. It was an important accomplishment. I think all would agree that diversity in attendance and speakers is a key goal; and the Boston team shares this view, and we wrote on this in our proposal to OSGeo. We have our own ideas on how to spur diversity and do not believe that “free all access passes to all speakers” is necessarily the only way to advance this important <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;display:inline">objective</div> (and we have not ruled out pricing and free passes as a tool to this end).<br></li><li style="margin-left:15px">We agree and are counting on east coast participation being an important part of our attendance base. At the same time, we hope not to lose the 10% (or whatever it turns out to be) participation of US attendees who may be prepared to travel cross-country but choose not to because they have a nearer-to-home option. We are planning on vigorous nationwide marketing for participation, and we hope to work with our international friends to encourage attendance and have this be the largest FOSS4G to date (and we hope that Bonn sets a new record for attendance in 2016!).</li><li style="margin-left:15px">Yes, we are aware that Boston is a relatively expensive city and that our hotel block rate was $260 (for 2 beds and double occupancy). At the same time, Boston’s costs are a function of its popularity and amenities and we believe interest in Boston and the New England region will help drive attendance. And, as we wrote in our proposal, there will be numerous lodging options beyond the hotel block that will provide more affordable lodging; from hostels to AirBnB to lower cost hotels outside the city but accessible by public transportation.</li></ul><p style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px"></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px">In the end, we love Eddie Pickle’s vision (that Robert Cheetham recounted in his post) of FOSS4G being among the most major geo gatherings, bar none. I have also heard Eddie relay this vision and coincidentally I will be meeting with him this coming Thursday in Washington, DC to further understand his ideas for <i>realizing</i> this vision. We see no reason why FOSS4G shouldn’t be the #2 geo event on the planet (and it is already the <i>best</i> one). As Robert wrote, over time, and as the gap narrows between the 10-15x difference between the Esri User Conference attendance and a growing FOSS4G attendance there will come a time where it will “be desirable to have sub-events that remain of substantive size…” But I would also agree that we are not there yet.</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px"> </p><p class="MsoNormal" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px">The Boston Team needs and strongly wants the full support of the North American community to help continue the momentum of stronger and stronger FOSS4G events. Together and with a singular focus we can do great things to make FOSS4G 2017 the largest and best possible event.</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px"> </p><p class="MsoNormal" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px">We thank everyone for this important discussion and also for your future support.</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px"> </p><p class="MsoNormal" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px">And in the meantime, we are looking forward to supporting a fantastic slate of 2016 events with FOSS4GNA in Raleigh, NC in May, and Global FOSS4G in Bonn in August.</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px"> </p><p class="MsoNormal" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px">Sincerely,</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px"> </p><p class="MsoNormal" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px">MT & the BLOC</p></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 11:56 PM, Robert Cheetham <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:cheetham@azavea.com" target="_blank">cheetham@azavea.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Rob,<div><br></div><div>Great comments. I agree on every front.</div><div><br></div><div>As a business owner, even if I might stretch to try to make it to both events, I'm unlikely to spend double, and each event would therefore receive less. That calculus won't change unless the audience at both is substantial.</div><div><br></div><div>Building on Jim Hughes message, I think there might be a day when having two conferences (NA and Global) in the same year would be both feasible and desirable. Eddie Pickle and others have expressed the idea that FOSS4G could be <i>the </i>major gathering of open source geospatial, similar in scale to the Esri User Conference - in other words, 10x more than what most of us are planning for a typical FOSS4G event. At that scale, it will likely be *desirable* to hive off sub-events that remain of substantive size and deliberately pull some audience away from the main event. But I don't think we are there yet.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">I also think Jody's suggestions were quite interesting. And such events need not necessarily use the FOSS4G moniker. For example, I think it would be cool to consider:</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"> * Big Geospatial Data Summit (or maybe High Performance Computing for Geospatial - HPC4G) </div><div class="gmail_extra"> * a concerted geospatial presence at <a href="http://www.supercomp.org/" target="_blank">SC</a></div><div class="gmail_extra"> * Civic Open Source Geospatial Conference</div><div class="gmail_extra"> * Geospatial for Social Good Conference</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">and so on.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Thanks,</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Robert<br clear="all"><div><div><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><span></span><span></span><br>------------------<br></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div><div><div class="h5">
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Rob Emanuele <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rdemanuele@gmail.com" target="_blank">rdemanuele@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div><div>Hi Andrea, thanks for bringing this up on the lists.</div><div><br></div><div>My feeling is that based on what knowledge I have and what I can reason about, I cannot be certain that having a FOSS4G NA in 2017 would *not* effect both attendance and sponsorship of, and ultimately have a negative impact on, both events.</div><div><br></div><div>My understanding is that sponsors we draw from for FOSS4G NA is a very similar set of sponsors that FOSS4G would draw from, and given the work that needs to get done for those companies to sponsor one conference, I don't think the two teams would be able to convince all of the potential sponsors to foot two bills without having to pick one conference to favor over the other.</div><div><br></div><div>For attendees who need to pay their own way, or have to justify going to conferences like FOSS4G to their employers, asking them to foot the bill for attending both a FOSS4G and a FOSS4G NA might be too much, and them having to make a choice is going to negatively affect attendance for both conferences. Because we are trying to build on the momentum of successful FOSS4G NA's, having one in a year which will necessitate a portion of the attendee base to choose one or the other conference is a way to actually stifle momentum, IMO more so than skipping a year. And while I think that there will be attendees on the west coast that would end up going to a west coast event but not the international event, I'm not sure this would make up for the attendees who would be able to attend either but not both conferences (and also feels a bit like a west-coast or pacific north west regional event, which might be cool).</div><div><br></div><div>If we have both sponsors and attendees that will need to go with one or the other conference, then that creates a force of schism in the community. I am not sure how strong that force would be, and I know that whoever would be in favor of having a regional 2017 conference (which no one has strongly argued in favor for yet) would not be trying to introduce that type of force at all. However, I believe we are in a time where the community coming together really matters: with Jeff stepping down as OSGeo president, with the echoes of anti-LocationTech sentiment still ringing in many of our ears from various heated exchanges on the mailing list months ago; also with the OSGeo board making strides to define and clarify it's vision and goals, and the work many people from LocationTech, OSGeo and other organizations or on their own are doing to break down organizational and other barriers to bring together the wider geospatial open source community, I think that it is not a good time to have any force of schism, however light it may be. Instead, let's to work to ensure that the international event is a success, and then make a big push for a very successful FOSS4G NA conference in 2018.</div><div><br></div><div>I'm glad this topic was brought up, so thanks again. The decision whether or not to have this specific regional event in the same year as an international event is not a forgone conclusion (as evidence by the fact that it has happened for other regional events). And though my and other's take on it is not in favor of having a FOSS4G NA 2017, hearing about the potential positives is good to consider, and deserves this discussion. For me, specifically hearing about Victoria for a potential conference spot makes me hopeful that it might be located there for 2018...I recently had a great time in Victoria for the LocationTech code sprint and am looking forward to going back!</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div>Rob</div></div><div><br></div></div><span>
<p></p>
-- <br>
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "foss4gna_selection" group.<br>
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to <a href="mailto:foss4gna_selection+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com" target="_blank">foss4gna_selection+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com</a>.<br>
To post to this group, send email to <a href="mailto:foss4gna_selection@googlegroups.com" target="_blank">foss4gna_selection@googlegroups.com</a>.<br></span>
To view this discussion on the web, visit <a href="https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/foss4gna_selection/CAFPWJ6dBKC-Ahbvbf0_xsjsYOJk6En6bkaeiGrwFuXGZXKfoFA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer" target="_blank">https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/foss4gna_selection/CAFPWJ6dBKC-Ahbvbf0_xsjsYOJk6En6bkaeiGrwFuXGZXKfoFA%40mail.gmail.com</a>.<div><div><br>
For more options, visit <a href="https://groups.google.com/d/optout" target="_blank">https://groups.google.com/d/optout</a>.<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div></div><div><div class="h5">
<p></p>
-- <br>
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "foss4gna_selection" group.<br>
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to <a href="mailto:foss4gna_selection+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com" target="_blank">foss4gna_selection+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com</a>.<br>
To post to this group, send email to <a href="mailto:foss4gna_selection@googlegroups.com" target="_blank">foss4gna_selection@googlegroups.com</a>.<br></div></div>
To view this discussion on the web, visit <a href="https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/foss4gna_selection/CAGEj39nopBR%2Boj6GejTZbBKwM3BmrW1MrvZ9b5YQ3t6xjOyyYw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer" target="_blank">https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/foss4gna_selection/CAGEj39nopBR%2Boj6GejTZbBKwM3BmrW1MrvZ9b5YQ3t6xjOyyYw%40mail.gmail.com</a>.<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
For more options, visit <a href="https://groups.google.com/d/optout" target="_blank">https://groups.google.com/d/optout</a>.<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:10px"><strong>Michael Terner</strong></span><br style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">
<em style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:10px">Executive Vice President</span></em><br>
<span style="font-size:9px">617-447-2468 Direct | 617-447-2400 Main</span><br>
<span style="font-size:9px"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">Applied Geographics, Inc.</span><br>
<span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">24 School Street, Suite 500<br>Boston, MA 02108</span><br>
<a href="http://www.AppGeo.com" target="_blank"><span style="color:#009933">www.AppGeo.com</span></a><br>
<strong> </strong> </span></div>
</div>
<br>
<span style="color:rgb(128,128,128);font-family:'Courier New';font-size:10px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)">This e-mail message and any attachments may contain confidential or legally privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient or otherwise authorized to receive this message, you should not use, copy, distribute, disclose or take any action based on the information contained in this e-mail or any attachments. If you have received this message and material in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you on behalf of Applied Geographics, Inc. (AppGeo).</span>