<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<style type="text/css" style="display:none;"><!-- P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} --></style>
</head>
<body dir="ltr">
<div id="divtagdefaultwrapper" style="font-size:12pt;color:#000000;background-color:#FFFFFF;font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">
<p>The ISPRS Conference I mentioned hosted 1500 attendees.</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Maria</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<div id="Signature">
<div id="divtagdefaultwrapper" style="font-size:12pt; color:#000000; background-color:#FFFFFF; font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">
<div name="divtagdefaultwrapper" style="font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:; margin:0">
<br>
<p><br>
</p>
<font size="3" face="'Trebuchet MS', sans-serif"><span style="background-color:rgb(204,153,255)"><font color="000000"><b><span style="background-color:rgb(255,255,255)">----------------------------------------------------<br>
</span></b></font></span></font>Prof. Maria Antonia Brovelli<br>
<div><font size="3" face="'Trebuchet MS', sans-serif">Vice Rector for Como Campus and GIS Professor<br>
Politecnico di Milano</font></div>
<font size="3" face="'Trebuchet MS', sans-serif"><span style="background-color:rgb(204,153,255)"><font color="000000"><b><span style="background-color:rgb(0,255,255)"></span></b></font></span></font><font size="3" face="'Trebuchet MS', sans-serif"><br>
</font><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="3" face="'Trebuchet MS', sans-serif"><span>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 0pt"><span>ISPRS WG IV/4"<span>Collaborative crowdsourced cloud mapping (C3M)</span>";</span><span>
</span><span>OSGeo; </span><span>ICA-OSGeo-ISPRS Advisory <font face="'Trebuchet MS', sans-serif">Board</font>; NASA WorldWind Europa Challenge;
</span><span>SIFET </span></p>
</span></font></font>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="3" face="'Trebuchet MS', sans-serif"><span><b><font face="'Trebuchet MS', sans-serif">Sol<font face="'Trebuchet MS', sans-serif"> Katz<font face="'Trebuchet MS', sans-serif">
<font face="'Trebuchet MS', sans-serif">Award<font face="'Trebuchet MS', sans-serif"> 2015</font></font></font></font></font></b></span></font></font><br>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 0pt"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 0pt"><span>Via Natta, 12/14 - 22100 COMO (ITAL<font face="'Trebuchet MS', sans-serif">Y</font>)</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 0pt"><span>Tel. +39-031-3327336 - Mob.</span><span> +39-328-0023867 -
</span><span>fax. <font color="000000">+39-031-3327321</font></span></p>
<font color="000000"></font>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 0pt"><span>e-mail1: <a href="mailto:maria.brovelli@polimi.it" tabindex="0" id="LPNoLP"></a><font color="333333"><font face="'Trebuchet MS', sans-serif">maria.brovelli@polimi.it</font></font></span></p>
<font color="000000"></font>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 0pt"><span><a tabindex="0" id="LPNoLP">e-mail2</a>:</span><span>
<font color="333333"><font face="'Trebuchet MS', sans-serif">prorettrice@como.polimi.it</font></font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 0pt"><br>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 0pt"><br>
<br>
</p>
<font size="3" face="'Trebuchet MS', sans-serif"></font>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 0pt"><font size="3" face="'Trebuchet MS', sans-serif"> </font></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<br>
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<div>
<hr tabindex="-1" style="display:inline-block; width:98%">
<div id="x_divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" color="#000000" style="font-size:11pt"><b>Da:</b> till.adams@fossgis.de <till.adams@fossgis.de><br>
<b>Inviato:</b> lunedì 12 settembre 2016 16.42<br>
<b>A:</b> Maria Antonia Brovelli; conference<br>
<b>Oggetto:</b> Re: [OSGeo-Conf] FOSS4G Handbook - Financial expectations</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
</div>
<font size="2"><span style="font-size:10pt;">
<div class="PlainText">Hi,<br>
<br>
Gert-Jan brings it to the point in my eyes.<br>
<br>
Beside what he said we know that it is very difficult to separate <br>
attendees within a venue between "eaters" and "non-eaters".<br>
Many people liked the way we did with almost no controls. There was <br>
only one at the main entrance, after that you could be anywhere.<br>
So, do we want somebody to control every badge before someone takes a <br>
plate of food or a drink?<br>
<br>
Again, in my eyes the point is to differentiate between smaller (and <br>
cheaper with less comfort) regional events and a global FOSS4G - where <br>
total costs of attendance ("TCA") are higher simply because of travel, <br>
accommodation and higher costs. One important point to aim on (there was <br>
a discussion in that direction few weeks ago) in my eyes is to bridge <br>
our community together with neighboured communities, business and large <br>
public administrations - which requires a "professional" conference with <br>
the potential to host up to 1000 attendees.<br>
<br>
And hey, do we really want to replace the cost-barrier (which is only <br>
to a minor part due to the TCA) with a restricted-places barrier?<br>
Come on, keep being realistic!<br>
<br>
I am convinced that success of past FOSS4G global events speaks for <br>
itself (++800 attendees on all events in NA and Europe since 2010), so <br>
why change such a success story, going back to Universities and loose <br>
contact to institutions that are really important for the growth of <br>
FOSS4G-Community as a whole?<br>
<br>
Please don't do that!<br>
<br>
Till<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Am 2016-09-12 10:13, schrieb Gert-Jan van der Weijden (OSGeo.nl):<br>
> Maria, others,<br>
><br>
><br>
> First of all: I hope this thread is not meant to discuss the<br>
> Boston-2017 setup, but the financial aspect of 2018 and onward. <br>
> Boston<br>
> 2017 is on it's way, based upon the bid they presented.<br>
><br>
> As a member of the Bonn-2016 LOC, and as visitor of FOSS4G-2015 Como,<br>
> and 2 local German speaking events (FOSSGIS) in 2015 (Münster) and<br>
> 2013 (Rapperswil) I note that there is a main difference between a<br>
> less than 500 attendees event (at an university: Como, Münster,<br>
> Rapperswill), and more than 500 attendees event, which due to it's<br>
> size almost by definition have to take place at a commercial congress<br>
> center. The latter brings more luxury (whether you like it or not)<br>
> since that's congress centers focus.<br>
> Standard package deals with congress centers' preferred suppliers for<br>
> catering, technique etc. almost can't be avoided, unless you pay a<br>
> sort of penalty fee.<br>
><br>
> Other expenses, including recorded and/or live-streaming video are a<br>
> relative small part of the total expenses. Availability of cheap<br>
> flights and/or cheap hotel accommodation has a far greater impact on<br>
> the TCA (total costs of attending).<br>
><br>
> Organizing a FOSS4G in the Como/Münster/Rapperswil way; at a relative<br>
> low cost venue such a university keeps the costs low, but almost<br>
> certainly will face you with the fact that demand (number of <br>
> potential<br>
> attendees) will be higher than supply (the number of available <br>
> seats).<br>
> That's a serious consideration to be made. And if so: would one<br>
> reserve a certain amount of ticket for each continent/local <br>
> chapter/OS<br>
> Geo project?<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> Kind regards,<br>
><br>
> Gert-Jan<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> Maria Antonia Brovelli schreef op 12-09-2016 0:23:<br>
>> One possibility is to consider different fees. As an example you can<br>
>> see the fees for last ISPRS Conference in Prague (8 days of<br>
>> conference):<br>
>> <a href="http://www.isprs2016-prague.com/fees/">http://www.isprs2016-prague.com/fees/</a><br>
>> Personally I prefer to eat simply a sandwich and be able to pay the<br>
>> registration for a PhD student of mine ;-)<br>
>> Why not consider a basic fee of 100 dollar/day and a full one with<br>
>> lunches and gala dinner?<br>
>> Maria<br>
>> Maria<br>
>> ISPRS 2016 - Fees & Registration [3]<br>
>> <a href="http://www.isprs2016-prague.com">www.isprs2016-prague.com</a><br>
>> Registration for Financial Assistance for the XXIII ISPRS Congress.<br>
>> Deadline for Financial Assistance applications 20 March 12 p.m. CET.<br>
>> ----------------------------------------------------<br>
>> Prof. Maria Antonia Brovelli<br>
>> Vice Rector for Como Campus and GIS Professor<br>
>> Politecnico di Milano<br>
>> ISPRS WG IV/4"Collaborative crowdsourced cloud mapping (C3M)"; <br>
>> OSGeo;<br>
>> ICA-OSGeo-ISPRS Advisory Board; NASA WorldWind Europa Challenge; <br>
>> SIFET<br>
>><br>
>> SOL KATZ AWARD 2015<br>
>> Via Natta, 12/14 - 22100 COMO (ITALY)<br>
>> Tel. +39-031-3327336 - Mob. +39-328-0023867 - fax. +39-031-3327321<br>
>> e-mail1: maria.brovelli@polimi.it<br>
>> e-mail2: prorettrice@como.polimi.it<br>
>> -------------------------<br>
>> DA: Steven Feldman <shfeldman@gmail.com><br>
>> INVIATO: domenica 11 settembre 2016 23.39<br>
>> A: Maria Antonia Brovelli<br>
>> CC: Michael Terner; Venkatesh Raghavan; Guido Stein; conference<br>
>> OGGETTO: Re: [OSGeo-Conf] FOSS4G Handbook - Financial expectations<br>
>> Maria<br>
>> Could you share some of the numbers from your conference:<br>
>> Venue fees<br>
>> Number of delegates<br>
>> Number of streams<br>
>> Cost for video<br>
>> Catering cost per head<br>
>> Icebreaker<br>
>> Gala night<br>
>> Other major costs<br>
>> Do you think you would have been able to accommodate 800-900 people <br>
>> at<br>
>> those rates in that venue? If so we should look at Como for 2019.<br>
>> I think the economics will vary for each city and venue. Perhaps we<br>
>> should make it clear that we would welcome alternative venue and <br>
>> cost<br>
>> proposals that potentially make the event cheaper to attend without<br>
>> excluding the possibility of a higher priced venue. If we get <br>
>> options<br>
>> running between say $200 for the 3 days and $650 then the conference<br>
>> committee will have an interesting choice to make.<br>
>> For 2018 we could also express our desire to make the event as<br>
>> accessible as possible and see what options are submitted?<br>
>> ______<br>
>> Steven<br>
>><br>
>>> On 11 Sep 2016, at 22:28, Maria Antonia Brovelli<br>
>>> <maria.brovelli@polimi.it> wrote:<br>
>>> Dear Michael, I wonder how it was possible for me to organize a<br>
>>> conference with a fee of 100 euro for 3 days ( 50 euro for<br>
>>> students). I understand that Boston is more expensive than Como. <br>
>>> But<br>
>>> more than three times? Is it not possible to organize the <br>
>>> conference<br>
>>> at one university? Keeping the costs low means giving more<br>
>>> possibility of participation to the people of our community.<br>
>>> Many thanks!<br>
>>> Maria<br>
>>> Sent from my Samsung device<br>
>>> -------- Original message --------<br>
>>> From: Michael Terner <mgt@appgeo.com><br>
>>> Date: 11/09/2016 18:49 (GMT+01:00)<br>
>>> To: Venkatesh Raghavan <venka.osgeo@gmail.com>, Michael Terner<br>
>>> <mgt@appgeo.com>, Guido Stein <gstein@appgeo.com><br>
>>> Cc: conference <conference_dev@lists.osgeo.org><br>
>>> Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Conf] FOSS4G Handbook - Financial expectations<br>
>>> As the group in the "on deck circle", this has been a very<br>
>>> interesting and important thread to read. I hope that sharing the<br>
>>> Boston team's outlook and perspective is useful to this<br>
>>> conversation. Indeed, many of the things we believe and are <br>
>>> pursuing<br>
>>> are already reflected:<br>
>>> * As Venka observes, we are not pursuing a "budget venue"<br>
>>> approach. We are in a large, urban city and as Steven wrote the<br>
>>> economics for finding this kind of space make $100/day really,<br>
>>> really difficult (if not impossible). But, we also believe we are <br>
>>> in<br>
>>> a desirable location with a dynamic tech city and an incredible<br>
>>> academic community that will help draw interest. We also want to<br>
>>> create a local, regional and USA buzz so that Boston is The Place <br>
>>> to<br>
>>> Be for understanding some of the international trends in geo open<br>
>>> source, and even the _ geo industry_ more broadly. As Eddie Pickle<br>
>>> has observed, why shouldn't FOSS4G be the #2 "geo event" on the<br>
>>> planet? In other words, one of our goals is to attract _more_ <br>
>>> people<br>
>>> who will be able to pay the full costs of the conference. From our<br>
>>> vantage, this shouldn't be a "low budget affair", it should be an<br>
>>> important "international happening."<br>
>>> * That said, we fully understand the reality and necessity to keep<br>
>>> the show as affordable as possible, and that there are very<br>
>>> important communities that we would like to have attend where the<br>
>>> published costs will be a challenge. We have plans for student<br>
>>> volunteers and other kinds of discounts already. But, the way that<br>
>>> some of the conference economics work, there is a tipping point<br>
>>> where a larger conference actually can be a lower of the core<br>
>>> conference costs (i.e., the venue, wifi, video, etc.) are prorated<br>
>>> across more people. We want to be the first FOSS4G to draw >1,000<br>
>>> people and we think we have a good shot at it. We also are going to<br>
>>> be very aggressive in pursuing sponsorship, both from the<br>
>>> established sponsor community, but also from first time sponsors,<br>
>>> and tech companies in Boston. This too will help generate revenue<br>
>>> and control costs. If we meet our attendance and sponsorship goals,<br>
>>> we will return a significant profit to OSGeo and we hope that those<br>
>>> profits can be used for the kinds of programs that Eli mentioned,<br>
>>> i.e., committees that distribute travel grants; or provide support<br>
>>> to events in the developing world; etc. Indeed, we have already<br>
>>> proposed to follow Cameron's suggestion and expressed our return of<br>
>>> profit to OSGeo as a percentage. Our proposal states returning 80%<br>
>>> of profits up to $100K, and 100% of profits that are above $100k<br>
>>> should we be lucky enough to be that successful.<br>
>>> Having just returned from Bonn, we are more excited and more<br>
>>> committed than ever (I just posted a blog on my impressions and<br>
>>> experiences [1]). And, we believe we can follow Till's and the Bonn<br>
>>> LOC's example in making this an exciting and dynamic event in a<br>
>>> unique part of the world. Bonn's World Conference Center venue was<br>
>>> worth its cost and added greatly to the event. We believe people<br>
>>> will come to this kind of event; and we are equally committed in<br>
>>> using the paying audience as a means of controlling costs and/or<br>
>>> providing discounts to those who need them.<br>
>>> All the best...<br>
>>> MT<br>
>>> On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 8:38 AM, Venkatesh Raghavan<br>
>>> <venka.osgeo@gmail.com> wrote:<br>
>>> I do not think we need to select a "budget venue".<br>
>>> Wonderful venues (perhaps, better than what we have seen thus far)<br>
>>> are available at a lower price in low-income countries.<br>
>>> I do not talk of any compromise on "core items" expected in<br>
>>> FOSS4G conferences. Is video streaming a "core item" which<br>
>>> was only recently possible in FOSS4G conferences?<br>
>>> If we say that this is a "core item", that is as good as<br>
>>> saying that FOSS4G conferences will be organized only in<br>
>>> OECD countries.<br>
>>> Venka<br>
>>> On 9/10/2016 5:29 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote:<br>
>>> Hi Venka,<br>
>>> I think that you are on the right track discussing "lower budget"<br>
>>> foss4g<br>
>>> conference in "lower income" countries.<br>
>>> While the Global FOSS4G is firstly an international "gathering of<br>
>>> the<br>
>>> tribes" and should prioritise needs of the international attendees,<br>
>>> we<br>
>>> should recognise that historically over half the attendees come <br>
>>> from<br>
>>> the<br>
>>> local region. I agree that it makes sense to see what can be done <br>
>>> to<br>
>>> help attract local attendees. If that means minimising costs, maybe<br>
>>> by<br>
>>> selecting budget venues etc, then a LOC should have the flexibility<br>
>>> to<br>
>>> suggest such options. However, selection budget options, should not<br>
>>> translate to reducing the core items which are expected in FOSS4G<br>
>>> conferences.<br>
>>> Warm regards, Cameron<br>
>>> On 10/09/2016 1:47 PM, Venkatesh Raghavan wrote:<br>
>>> Hi Cameron,<br>
>>> My comments inline.<br>
>>> On 9/9/2016 9:05 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote:<br>
>>> Hi Venka,<br>
>>> Thanks for suggesting specific ideas to implement.<br>
>>> For this email thread, I'd like to focus on your suggestions <br>
>>> related<br>
>>> to<br>
>>> financial expectations, so we can take it through to resolution.<br>
>>> Namely,<br>
>>> your item 5. Defining how profit should be returned to OSGeo.<br>
>>> I suggest it is safer to define budget returned to OSGeo as a<br>
>>> percentage<br>
>>> of profit. As profit closely aligns with number of attendees, <br>
>>> profit<br>
>>> will be larger for larger events. Europe and US have historically<br>
>>> attracted larger attendance than "Rest of World" and hence will<br>
>>> return<br>
>>> larger profit. As such, OSGeo should expect to earn less in "Rest <br>
>>> of<br>
>>> World" years.<br>
>>> Yes, I agree with above. However "Rest of the World" include only<br>
>>> low-income countries and not high-income countries like Australia,<br>
>>> Japan, Korea etc. FOSS4G Conferences in low-income countries may<br>
>>> spend<br>
>>> less (lower venue and food costs) and also earn less compared to<br>
>>> events<br>
>>> in Europe and North America.<br>
>>> I thought the RFP defined an expected budget to be returned to<br>
>>> OSGeo<br>
>>> under conservative estimates, but I can't find reference to it.<br>
>>> (Maybe<br>
>>> someone else can point to it).<br>
>>> For management of special interest programs and sponsorship, I<br>
>>> suggest<br>
>>> refer to the email thread "FOSS4G Simplicity" started by Eli Adam,<br>
>>> suggesting the be coordinated outside of the FOSS4G LOC (Like the<br>
>>> academic track).<br>
>>> I agree to making thinks easier and simpler coordinating Academic<br>
>>> Track,<br>
>>> Awards, Travel Grants outside the LoC.<br>
>>> Best<br>
>>> Venka<br>
>>> On 9/09/2016 10:03 AM, Venkatesh Raghavan wrote:<br>
>>> My Comments inline.<br>
>>> On 9/9/2016 7:40 AM, Steven Feldman wrote:<br>
>>> Maria<br>
>>> Nice image, what are you suggesting in terms of the RfP? ______<br>
>>> Steven<br>
>>> On 8 Sep 2016, at 22:03, Maria Antonia Brovelli<br>
>>> <maria.brovelli@polimi.it> wrote:<br>
>>> <equity.jpg><br>
>>> Dear Cameron I prefer to take into account the differences among<br>
>>> countries. We want to elicit people developing and using open<br>
>>> source and we want to walk all together toward this result.<br>
>>> Equality often is not the best choice. Best regards Maria<br>
>> +1 for Maria's suggestion.<br>
>> I would suggest the following;<br>
>> 1) There was some comment on issue of too many people<br>
>> requesting for free conference passes.<br>
>> We need to clearly decide a guideline for offering free passes.<br>
>> Free passes only offered to main Workshop Trainer, Keynote speakers<br>
>> and<br>
>> student volunteers? Apart from that *no one* gets a free pass.<br>
>> 2) continue the discounted conference fee model for<br>
>> low-income countries. This model has been successfully<br>
>> used in FOSS4G-2015<br>
>> 3) Offer Travel support only for participants who are<br>
>> have their presentation accepted at the FOSS4G conference.<br>
>> 4) Are we considering live streaming in future FOSS4G events?<br>
>> In that case, request local chapters to organize local "FOSS4GFest"<br>
>> during the duration of the main FOSS4G Conference and<br>
>> take advantage of watching the live-streaming along with<br>
>> the local community members who are unable to physically make it<br>
>> to the FOSS4G event.<br>
>> 5) Consider recommending LoC to return a minimum fixed amount<br>
>> of profit to OSGeo. Taking into account, that OSGeo annual<br>
>> budget for 2015 is $75,000, we could consider having $50K-$60K<br>
>> returned from the profit to OSGeo foundation when FOSS4G is<br>
>> organized in high-income countries and $25K-$30K when FOSS4G<br>
>> is organized in low-income countries (they can retain part of<br>
>> the profit for organizing events to grow local communities, but<br>
>> should submit a budget report in subsequent FOSS4G conferences<br>
>> as to how the profits were used). This will help the foundation to<br>
>> sustain the "Travel Grant", "Student Award" and "Code Sprint" at<br>
>> FOSS4G events.<br>
>> 6) If the LoC of FOSS4G event is able to generate more profit<br>
>> that stated in item 5 above, let them have a say in planning<br>
>> how such "extra" profit will be used in future.<br>
>> 7) Consider a upper cap on the conference registration fee.<br>
>> I would suggest $100/day of conference event when organized<br>
>> in high-income countries. This would be much lower when FOSS4G<br>
>> is organized in a low-income country<br>
>> Best<br>
>> Venka<br>
>><br>
>>> Sent from my Samsung device<br>
>>> -------- Original message -------- From: Cameron Shorter<br>
>>> <cameron.shorter@gmail.com> Date: 08/09/2016 22:53 (GMT+01:00) To:<br>
>>> conference <conference_dev@lists.osgeo.org> Subject: Re:<br>
>>> [OSGeo-Conf] FOSS4G Handbook - Financial expectations<br>
>>> Ok, lets start working through Steven's list one item at a time,<br>
>>> starting a new email thread for each.<br>
>>> Once we have resolution (probably concluding with a vote) we can<br>
>>> finalise it in the foss4g handbook.<br>
>>> On 8/09/2016 9:12 PM, Steven Feldman wrote:<br>
>>> 1) Overall financial expectations re surplus and sharing of<br>
>>> surplus with OSGeo - possibly setting slightly different<br>
>>> expectations for RoW to NA & EU<br>
>> We have draft principles on Finances in the handbook here:<br>
>> <a href="https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_Handbook#Finances">https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_Handbook#Finances</a> [4]<br>
>> <<a href=""></a>https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_Handbook#Finances [4]><br>
>> I suggest using this existing text as the basis for guidance. I<br>
>> personally think it has the right principles in place. In<br>
>> particular, it is recommending each conference aim to hand over a<br>
>> fixed percentage of profits as surplus to OSGeo. 85% is suggested.<br>
>> I prefer this advise over the suggestion that low income countries<br>
>> retain more profit.<br>
>> -- Cameron Shorter M +61 419 142 254 [5]<br>
>> _______________________________________________ Conference_dev<br>
>> mailing list Conference_dev@lists.osgeo.org<br>
>> <a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev</a> [2]<br>
>> <<a href=""></a>http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev<br>
>> [2]>_______________________________________________<br>
>> Conference_dev mailing list<br>
>><br>
>>>> Conference_dev@lists.osgeo.org<br>
>>>> <a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev</a> [2]<br>
>>> _______________________________________________ Conference_dev<br>
>>> mailing list Conference_dev@lists.osgeo.org<br>
>>> <a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev</a> [2]<br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> Conference_dev mailing list<br>
>> Conference_dev@lists.osgeo.org<br>
>> <a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev</a> [2]<br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> Conference_dev mailing list<br>
>> Conference_dev@lists.osgeo.org<br>
>> <a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev</a> [2]<br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> Conference_dev mailing list<br>
>> Conference_dev@lists.osgeo.org<br>
>> <a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev</a> [2]<br>
>> --<br>
>> MICHAEL TERNER<br>
>> _Executive Vice President_<br>
>> 617-447-2468 Direct | 617-447-2400 Main<br>
>> Applied Geographics, Inc.<br>
>> 24 School Street, Suite 500<br>
>> Boston, MA 02108<br>
>> <a href="http://www.AppGeo.com">www.AppGeo.com</a> [6]<br>
>> _CELEBRATING OUR 25TH ANNIVERSARY _<br>
>> This e-mail message and any attachments may contain confidential or<br>
>> legally privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient<br>
>> or otherwise authorized to receive this message, you should not use,<br>
>> copy, distribute, disclose or take any action based on the <br>
>> information<br>
>> contained in this e-mail or any attachments. If you have received <br>
>> this<br>
>> message and material in error, please advise the sender immediately <br>
>> by<br>
>> reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you on behalf of Applied<br>
>> Geographics, Inc. (AppGeo).<br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> Conference_dev mailing list<br>
>> Conference_dev@lists.osgeo.org<br>
>> <a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev</a><br>
>><br>
>> Links:<br>
>> ------<br>
>> [1]<br>
>> <br>
>> <a href="http://www.appgeo.com/blog/picked-pieces-global-2017-foss4g-conference-bonn-germany/">
http://www.appgeo.com/blog/picked-pieces-global-2017-foss4g-conference-bonn-germany/</a><br>
>> [2] <a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev</a><br>
>> [3] <a href="http://www.isprs2016-prague.com/fees/">http://www.isprs2016-prague.com/fees/</a><br>
>> [4] <a href="https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_Handbook#Finances">https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_Handbook#Finances</a><br>
>> [5] tel:%2B61%20419%20142%20254<br>
>> [6] <a href="http://www.appgeo.com/">http://www.appgeo.com/</a><br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> Conference_dev mailing list<br>
>> Conference_dev@lists.osgeo.org<br>
>> <a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev</a><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Conference_dev mailing list<br>
> Conference_dev@lists.osgeo.org<br>
> <a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev</a><br>
<br>
</div>
</span></font></div>
</div>
</body>
</html>