<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>+1 </div>
<div>Maria</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div id="composer_signature">
<div dir="auto" style="font-size:88%; color:#364f67">Inviato dal mio dispositivo Samsung</div>
</div>
<br>
<br>
-------- Messaggio originale --------<br>
Da: Peter Batty <peter@ebatty.com> <br>
Data: 04/09/17 17:10 (GMT+01:00) <br>
A: conference <conference_dev@lists.osgeo.org> <br>
Oggetto: Re: [OSGeo-Conf] Start 2019 RFP / Board discussion about RFP for FOSS4G-2019
<br>
<br>
<div>
<div dir="ltr">+1 on allowing bidders flexibility on the dates that they propose.</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 12:31 AM, Till Adams <span dir="ltr">
<<a href="mailto:till.adams@fossgis.de" target="_blank">till.adams@fossgis.de</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:1px #ccc solid; padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF">+1 - fully agreed. So we wil lhint on our regular time period, but let the bidding teams propose their favoured times.<br>
<br>
I just wanted to start a discussion around this and detect the opinions around that.
<br>
<br>
(Now knowing, that also is an option in the meaning of some members of CC, I feel less guilty because we @Bonn started this August-dates ;-))<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
<br>
Till</font></span>
<div>
<div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="m_-1874218421751104417moz-cite-prefix">Am 03.09.2017 19:59, schrieb Steven Feldman:<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<div class="h5">+1 to everything MT has said below re dates
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I’d also add that moving to September may well mean a clash with the Jewish High Holy Days which often land in September or early October. No date choice works for everyone!</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Let’s live the choice of date open to bidders and ask them to give some explanation of the reason for their choice and the outline possible options to move to another date/venue at a different cost (if any)<br>
<div><span class="m_-1874218421751104417Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse:separate; color:rgb(0,0,0); font-family:Helvetica; font-style:normal; font-variant:normal; font-weight:normal; letter-spacing:normal; line-height:normal; text-indent:0px; text-transform:none; white-space:normal; word-spacing:0px">______<br>
Steven<br>
<br>
</span></div>
<br>
<div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>On 3 Sep 2017, at 18:29, Michael Terner <<a href="mailto:mgt@appgeo.com" target="_blank">mgt@appgeo.com</a>> wrote:</div>
<br class="m_-1874218421751104417Apple-interchange-newline">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif">Just one note on dates coming in the wake of Boston where we heard loud, and often about our mid-August time period. And, as has been pointed out, this timing did not deter our ability to attract
a record number of delegates:</div>
<div class="gmail_default">
<ol>
<li><font face="tahoma,
sans-serif">No time period is good for everyone. Some people are on vacation in August. Other people have significant academic calendar challenges with September. There will
<i>always</i> be some people disappointed/frustrated by a given date. I do not believe it is in the best interest of the conference to declare that August vacations are more/less important than other legitimate conflicts with other time periods.</font>
</li><li><font face="tahoma,
sans-serif">At least in the US, there are significant cost and availability variations between August and September/October. Boston would have been a more expensive conference, with more expensive lodging had
it been held in September.</font> </li><li><font face="tahoma,
sans-serif">Indeed, while August does mean that some people who are on vacation cannot come, it is likely that it also opened up an ability for others to come who might not have been able to make a September
date (hence the good attendance figures from the past 2 August conferences).</font>
</li></ol>
<div><font face="tahoma, sans-serif">From my vantage, it is OK to have a conference that moves around an August - October time period. The specific conference date is chosen by the CC/Board and based on what was proposed. I do not believe it is in the best
long term interest of the conference to have iron-clad limits on what might be proposed.</font></div>
<div><font face="tahoma, sans-serif"><br>
</font></div>
<div><font face="tahoma, sans-serif">Reading from afar, it looks like very good work, with predictable challenges attempting to be addressed (i.e., cost containment; data selection; etc.). </font><span style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif">Best of luck in getting
the RFP for 2019 on the street.</span><span style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif"> </span></div>
<div><font face="tahoma, sans-serif"><br>
</font></div>
<div><font face="tahoma, sans-serif">MT</font></div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Cameron Shorter <span dir="ltr">
<<a href="mailto:cameron.shorter@gmail.com" target="_blank">cameron.shorter@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:1px #ccc solid; padding-left:1ex">
Till,<br>
<br>
Thanks so much for taking the lead on this. In our do-ocracy your vote counts for much.<br>
<br>
Re selecting dates, I agree we have diverse opinions on dates and are not likely to agree, but lets not have our committee members select a conference venue based on date proposed, (which might be the case if the opinions voiced here is the case). It is not
fair to the cities putting in proposals.<br>
<br>
We should collectively work out our opinion as a committee, and provide that information to proposers. Maybe do a poll of voting committee members for date ranges, and present that information to proposing cities.
<div class="m_-1874218421751104417HOEnZb">
<div class="m_-1874218421751104417h5"><br>
<br>
<br>
On 31/8/17 11:58 pm, Till Adams wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:1px #ccc solid; padding-left:1ex">
Hi CC,<br>
<br>
based on the discussion that already took pace in the past 2 hours, I think we will not find an agreement, that satisfies everybody here. I'd suggest to follow Steven (let the bidding teams suggest their prefered date) and add a comment, that teams should line
out, what an alternative date would mean in sight of costs or other circumstances (in Bonn they tourist office simply told me, that they could not block as many accommodations as needed).<br>
<br>
So, if a bidding team suggests a date, that lies in "normal" holiday periods (I know, that holidays vary from year to year, in Germany they do it for every state every year), we could please them to briefly line out what an alternative date in, let's say, September
would mean.<br>
<br>
I'd more prefer, if anybody from CC (except Steven, he is on holidays ;-)) could make comments on my time schedule for the RFP... ;-)<br>
<br>
Till<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Am <a href="tel:31.08.2017%2015" value="+13108201715" target="_blank">31.08.2017 15</a>:51, schrieb Dirk Frigne:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:1px #ccc solid; padding-left:1ex">
IMHO was Bonn (2016) during the last week of August. Boston (2017) was<br>
August 15, which is a holiday and in the middle of the holiday season.<br>
<br>
my2c.<br>
<br>
btw, how many visitors where in Boston?<br>
<br>
On 31-08-17 15:17, Bart van den Eijnden wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:1px #ccc solid; padding-left:1ex">
Several members of our community have pointed out that it is an issue<br>
for them to attend, e.g. Jeroen Ticheler pointed this out before. For me<br>
this is the same, I normally can't attend a conference in the school<br>
vacation. Boston wasn't possible. Bonn was barely possible because<br>
schools had just started that week (but some years school vacation will<br>
be until early September even due to regional rotation).<br>
<br>
Looking at attendance figures and saying it's no big issue doesn't<br>
really give the right attention to the problem IMHO.<br>
<br>
Also even if the venue might be cheaper, I'm sure flights and<br>
accommodation will be expensive in the European holiday season.<br>
<br>
Best regards,<br>
<br>
Bart<br>
<br>
<br>
On 31-08-17 15:03, Steven Feldman wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:1px #ccc solid; padding-left:1ex">
2016 was in august and attracted 940/950 people<br>
2017 was in august and attracted 1140 people<br>
That's record attendance 2 years running (in August)<br>
<br>
Doesn't look like August is a big issue for us in the northern<br>
hemisphere.<br>
I also heard from some of the organisers that they were able to obtain<br>
lower rates for venues in August<br>
<br>
I think we should leave it to LOCs to propose the dates that work for<br>
them based on regional holiday patterns, pricing, weather and any<br>
other constraints they may have<br>
<br>
Now I'm going back to my end of august holiday ;)<br>
<br>
Steven<br>
<br>
<br>
On 31 Aug 2017, at 13:15, María Arias de Reyna <<a href="mailto:delawen@gmail.com" target="_blank">delawen@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:1px #ccc solid; padding-left:1ex">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:1px #ccc solid; padding-left:1ex">
Also I can imagine of editing the section regarding the conference<br>
dates:<br>
I think we just have s.t.h like a target timeperiod (Sept-Oct), but we<br>
should hint bidding teams, that they may choose the best and/or<br>
maybe also<br>
cheaper period around this target period. On the other hand, I also<br>
know,<br>
that there have been some problems for people attending the<br>
conferences in<br>
2016 and 2017 that took place in holiday-pregnant August, so maybe<br>
we can<br>
also have a discussion whether we can/will allow people to have their<br>
conference in August?<br>
</blockquote>
I think this is very important. Having the conference during the<br>
northern summer may look appealing to people that go to conferences as<br>
if they were holidays. But for people that need to take care of their<br>
family or people that just want to enjoy their holidays disconnecting<br>
from work, this is a major issue.<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="m_-1874218421751104417mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset> <br>
</div>
</div>
<span class="">
<pre>______________________________<wbr>_________________
Conference_dev mailing list
<a class="m_-1874218421751104417moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Conference_dev@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">Conference_dev@lists.osgeo.org</a>
<a class="m_-1874218421751104417moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev" target="_blank">https://lists.osgeo.org/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/conference_<wbr>dev</a></pre>
</span></blockquote>
<br>
</div>
<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Conference_dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Conference_dev@lists.osgeo.org">Conference_dev@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.osgeo.org/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/conference_<wbr>dev</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>