<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <p>Hi Michael,</p>
    <p>Sorry for the delayed response. You have done some really good
      work cleaning up these metrics. I haven't got any suggestions of
      improvement to note. The old metrics page has been showing its age
      and you have made it easier to maintain long term. Well done! </p>
    <p>I have to confess that I haven't been giving the metrics page the
      love it deserves over the last few years, and with a my change of
      job that is not likely to change. So it is great to see you pick
      up the ball and take these metrics to the next level.</p>
    <p>I think that your metrics should become the point of truth from
      now on, and move the original one I started into a archive status.
      I'd be interested to hear your thoughts on how we do this. Maybe:</p>
    <p>1. Trawl the web for references to the old metrics page and
      update to point at your new page?</p>
    <p>2. Or, keep the URL of the old page, move your content into the
      old URL, and copy out the old content into an archived page.</p>
    <p>Warm regards, Cameron<br>
    </p>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 22/1/18 4:53 am, Michael Terner
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAEFvZu7cvZZJfNL0ehk=ESqHYi8zJ5PzKeQztSnFAns=f8WK6Q@mail.gmail.com">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif">The
          Boston Team would like to let people know that we are actively
          engaged in rounding out our final documentation on lessons
          learned and presenting our data in ways that will hopefully be
          useful to future planning teams. There are two areas where we
          have focused our efforts:</div>
        <div class="gmail_default">
          <ol>
            <li><font face="tahoma, sans-serif">As per an earlier thread
                with <b>Cameron</b>, I have forked and updated the
                historic registration tracking spreadsheet that has been
                contributed to since 2006. I have renamed the sheet "<a
href="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1UzMhTia60QvWDtnZ9maGBfnaRCdj0r__Li07lG4WgIg/edit?usp=sharing"
                  moz-do-not-send="true"><b>FOSS4G Registration Tracking
                    New 2018</b></a>". More information on the changes
                to this sheet, and recommendations for further
                improvement are found <span
                  style="background-color:rgb(255,229,153)">below</span>
                (as many of you are likely to find this additional info
                TL;DR).</font></li>
            <li><font face="tahoma, sans-serif">As per encouragement
                from <b>Jeff</b>, our team has also begun to fill out
                the<b> <a
                    href="https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_2017_Lessons_Learned"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">FOSS4G 2017 Lessons Learned
                    page on the Wiki</a></b>. We're not done, but it's
                taking shape and one of our goals is to use this page as
                place to provide linkages to other materials that remain
                on our website, or to Google docs that contain our data.</font></li>
          </ol>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif">And
          of course, we welcome direct outreach from the Dar es Salaam
          and Bucharest teams if there is anything we can do to help in
          a more direct way. Indeed, that's how all other teams we
          reached out to treated us.<br>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif"><br>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif">All
          the best, and most sincerely,</div>
        <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif"><br>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif">MT
          & The BLOC</div>
        <div>-- <br>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_signature">
          <div dir="ltr">
            <div dir="ltr">
              <div><font face="tahoma, sans-serif"><span
                    style="font-size:small">Michael Terner</span><br>
                </font></div>
              <div>
                <div class="gmail_default"
                  style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif">​<font size="1">FOSS4G
                    Boston 2017 Conference Chair</font></div>
                <div class="gmail_default"
                  style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif"><font size="1">EVP
                    <a href="http://www.appgeo.com"
                      moz-do-not-send="true">AppGeo</a>​</font></div>
                <div class="gmail_default"
                  style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif">​~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~</div>
              </div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>
                <div class="gmail_default"
                  style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif"><span
                    style="background-color:rgb(255,229,153)"><font
                      size="4">​<b>Further Info on the New Registration
                        Tracking Sheet</b>​</font></span></div>
                <br>
              </div>
              <div>
                <div class="gmail_default"
                  style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif">​As per that
                  sidebar with Cameron, that sheet was quite old and
                  while chalk-full of good info it also contains a
                  variety of approaches to presenting the info and some
                  information that had not been maintained. In short,
                  there's a fair amount of detritus in there too. As
                  such, I have refactor​ed the sheet in a way that I
                  think encourages consistent information gathering and
                  is is also a bit more scalable for collecting this
                  information for the long term. Here's what it looks
                  like and what was done:</div>
                <div class="gmail_default" style="">
                  <ul style="">
                    <li style=""><font face="tahoma, sans-serif">The new
                        sheet opens to a new <b>summary table</b> which
                        presents the core data from every conference
                        since 2006. The data for this summary table
                        originates from individual spreadsheet tabs, one
                        for each conference.</font></li>
                    <li style=""><font face="tahoma, sans-serif">There <b>are
                          some holes in the data</b> in this table based
                        on the data collected by each conference team
                        (as presented in the original spreadsheet).
                        These include:</font></li>
                    <ul>
                      <li style=""><font face="tahoma, sans-serif"><b>Lausanne</b>,
                          not reporting on Early Bird</font></li>
                      <li style=""><font face="tahoma, sans-serif"><b>Nottingham
                          </b>and <b>Portland</b>, not reporting on
                          "host country" or "international"</font></li>
                      <li style=""><font face="tahoma, sans-serif"><b>Bonn</b>,
                          not yet reporting out their numbers</font></li>
                    </ul>
                    <li>Hopefully, some of those missing numbers can be
                      added into those tabs, and then made available
                      through this summary sheet. If not, now the bar is
                      set for future conference teams on the information
                      that has been most consistently gathered over
                      time.<br>
                    </li>
                    <li><font face="tahoma, sans-serif">I have created a
                        couple of <b>"example" charts</b> from the
                        summary table showing the potential benefits of
                        gathering our data in a summary fashion.</font></li>
                    <ul>
                      <li><font face="tahoma, sans-serif">I will also
                          note that there aren't clear trends (e.g., in
                          terms of the conference growing every year)
                          due to the rotating nature of the venue (i.e.,
                          the "other regions" conferences might be
                          better measured next to one another, rather
                          than next to all conferences).</font></li>
                    </ul>
                    <li><font face="tahoma, sans-serif">As you look at
                        the individual tabs, you will see conference
                        teams tracked their data in different ways,
                        which is fine and appropriate. The goals is to
                        get the same raw numbers for the summary table
                        to track over time, i.e., these 4 columns:</font></li>
                    <ul>
                      <li><font face="tahoma, sans-serif"><b>Total</b>
                          registrations</font></li>
                      <li><font face="tahoma, sans-serif"><b>Early bird
                          </b>registrations</font></li>
                      <li><font face="tahoma, sans-serif"><b>Host
                            country</b> registrations</font></li>
                      <li><font face="tahoma, sans-serif"><b>International
                          </b>registrations</font></li>
                    </ul>
                    <li><font face="tahoma, sans-serif">The tab titled <b>RegDate</b> represents
                        what was shared with our team via the last
                        formulation of the older sheet. My hope was that
                        I could remove that tab, as well as the other <i>18
                          tabs </i>to the right of it. This proved
                        harder than I thought as the data in RegDate was
                        linked to those 18 tabs; and the charts in
                        RegDate were linked to those data.</font></li>
                    <li><font face="tahoma, sans-serif">In copying the
                        data from RegDate to the individual tabs, I did
                        break the linkage to the older tabs by using
                        "Paste Special" for the <i>numbers.</i> But the
                        charts found in those tabs are still linked to
                        RegDate data so those older 18 tabs still
                        remain. Those charts could be rebuilt from the
                        new, "pasted special" data, but we have not done
                        that yet.</font></li>
                    <li><font face="tahoma, sans-serif">Indeed, <b>we
                          wanted to get others' impressions</b> on
                        whether the approach we're taking makes sense
                        and should be continued. If so, we can break the
                        linkage to RegDate, recreate the charts in each
                        tab, and move forward in this direction. And, of
                        course, we'll have, and keep a copy of the
                        RegDate sheet for posterity.</font></li>
                    <li><font face="tahoma, sans-serif">Last, those 18
                        tabs also contain valuable information on things
                        like sponsorship. Those data weren't collected
                        for every conference so full historic tracking
                        is still quite difficult. We would argue/propose
                        that other key things like <b>workshops </b>and<b>
                          sponsorship </b>should<b> have their own
                          tracking sheets</b> and that future conference
                        teams share their data to those sheets.</font></li>
                    <li><font face="tahoma, sans-serif">Toward that end,
                        and as you will find on the <a
href="https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_2017_Lessons_Learned#Sponsorship"
                          moz-do-not-send="true">OSGeo Wiki under our
                          Lessons Learned in the Sponsors section</a>,
                        we have compiled a <b><a
href="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1o7_J3Tmq70mgsdxrfsiL0rAi1EEojaCF1HrcWmUiydw/edit#gid=0"
                            moz-do-not-send="true">Sponsor Tracking
                            sheet</a></b> that dates back to Barcelona,
                        2010 and includes any sponsor that supported
                        either a Global FOSS4G, or a FOSS4G North
                        America. These data were assembled by reviewing
                        the archived web-sites from past conferences and
                        simply counting logos. If others are interested
                        in helping to maintain this sheet, we would be
                        pleased to modify the current "View Only"
                        sharing settings with interested parties.</font></li>
                    <li><font face="tahoma, sans-serif">As appropriate,
                        we have our<b> workshop data</b> and would be
                        willing to work with other previous conference
                        teams <b>to create a shared, workshop summary
                          spreadsheet of key data</b>. Indeed, in our
                        planning, uncovering past information on
                        workshops was surprisingly difficult. For
                        workshops, key data might include:</font></li>
                    <ul>
                      <li><font face="tahoma, sans-serif">Number of
                          workshops</font></li>
                      <li><font face="tahoma, sans-serif">Number of
                          workshop attendees</font></li>
                      <li><font face="tahoma, sans-serif">Costs for
                          attending workshops</font></li>
                      <li><font face="tahoma, sans-serif">Costs for
                          compensating workshop instructors (whether via
                          cash; or free registration)</font></li>
                    </ul>
                  </ul>
                  <div><font face="tahoma, sans-serif">Let us know if
                      you have any questions; and also what you all
                      think about the new formatting and data.</font></div>
                  <div><font face="tahoma, sans-serif"><br>
                    </font></div>
                  <div><font face="tahoma, sans-serif">MT</font></div>
                  <font face="tahoma, sans-serif"><br>
                  </font></div>
                <div class="gmail_default"
                  style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif"><br>
                </div>
                <br>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <span style="color:rgb(128,128,128);font-family:'Courier
        New';font-size:10px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)">This
        e-mail message and any attachments may contain confidential or
        legally privileged information. If you are not an intended
        recipient or otherwise authorized to receive this message, you
        should not use, copy, distribute, disclose or take any action
        based on the information contained in this e-mail or any
        attachments. If you have received this message and material in
        error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and
        delete this message. Thank you on behalf of Applied Geographics,
        Inc. (AppGeo).</span>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
Cameron Shorter
Technology Demystifier, Learnosity
Open Technologies Consultant

M +61 (0) 419 142 254</pre>
  </body>
</html>