[OSGeo-Discuss] Comparison of Mobile GIS applications

Bob Basques Bob.Basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us
Mon Feb 14 06:56:14 PST 2011


All, 

Just resurrecting this thread.  It's been 6 months.  I've done a couple of little projects with the N900 which are detailed here: http://pwultra5.ci.stpaul.mn.us/OPERA/ 

Question to Chris S., do you have any other insights into the directions that the N900 device (or others like it) might be taking in the future (that you can mention? :c)  I'm setting up some netbooks next for the two projects listed above, using essentially the same software stack as used for the N900, which it is somewhat amazing when you think about it.  I would still like to revisit the Mobile controls issues for OpenLayers and GeoMoose at some point, but focusing on flexibility with software stack at the moment. 

Thanks 

bobb 




>>> Christopher Schmidt <crschmidt at crschmidt.net> wrote:


On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 03:25:45PM -0500, Bob Basques wrote:
> Milo,
>
> You mentioned MEEGO in your post, I just ordered a N900 to do some testing for GIS related stuff on the N900.  What types of functionalities are you focusing your efforts on for MEEGO?

Note that the current development platform for the N900 (and likely
for the next 6 months at least) is still Maemo. The two platforms
will likely not differ greatly; a lot of the UI functionality is already
SDK-level in Maemo, and apps themselves likely won't change much
other than packaging. In either case, it's mostly just a Very Small
Linux Box.

-- Chris, proud owner of an N900

> bobb
>
>
>
> >>> miblon <moblin at dogodigi.net> wrote:
>
> I have been using navit and osm2go on moblin. There is a debian build
> for osm2go which is targeted at maemo, I managed to get it up on moblin
> and will try to get it running on meego.
>
> If you are interested in me filling the blanks for these 2 apps on your
> feature list, let me know.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Milo van der Linden
>
> Miguel Montesinos wrote:
> > Hello to all,
> >
> > I'm preparing a presentation for the FOSS4G, with title "Comparison of
> > Mobile GIS applications". I know some, but I think that the best way to
> > make an objective analysis is to offer the chance for anyone to
> > collaborate, in order to define common feature lists as well as
> > perfomance or usability check lists.
> >
> > Is anyone developing or using a mobile geospatial application
> > interested?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------
> > Miguel Montesinos
> > CTO
> > PRODEVELOP, S.L.
> > mmontesinos [at] prodevelop [dot] es
> > www.prodevelop.es
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Discuss mailing list
> > Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >
> > 
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>

> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


--
Christopher Schmidt
Web Developer
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20110214/09a0e9bb/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Discuss mailing list