[OSGeo-Discuss] Geomajas Geometry Project

[Jody Garnett]

There is a third model; the ISO19107 model that deals with a few more things; it is however object oriented in nature....

-- 
Jody Garnett


On Wednesday, 13 July 2011 at 6:36 PM, Pieter De Graef wrote:

> Hi everyone,
> 
> for the Geomajas project, we are looking into separating the Geometry functionality into an independent project. In other words, I am talking about a Geometry project for the Web. This code would be written in Java for GWT and thus be available on Java backends as well as client environments (we intend to add a JavaScript wrapper around the GWT code). 
> 
> Now the problem that I'm facing here, is which model to follow....
> 
> On one hand there is the Simple Feature Specification which is clearly an Object Oriented model with the advantage that it is well known but is also more difficult to implement the JavaScript wrapper around. 
> 
> On the other hand we could follow a service based model (more like SFS for SQL) which is easier to get up and running, easier to create a JavaScript wrapper for and easier to translate into web services. 
> 
> As it's difficult for us to chose and as it's a pretty crucial decision for the future of the Geomajas project, I as wondering how you guys feel about this.
> 
> Kind regards, 
> 
> Pieter De Graef 
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org (mailto:Discuss at lists.osgeo.org)
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20110713/46262bc4/attachment-0001.html