[OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] About "Interactive Map" patent application by Apple Inc.

Ravi Kumar ravivundavalli48 at yahoo.com
Sun Dec 22 00:33:30 PST 2013


In principle we have to fight this, as this is what OSGeo software is capable of from a very long time.
Ravi Kumar



On Saturday, December 21, 2013 10:08 PM, Carl Reed <creed at opengeospatial.org> wrote:
 
Venka -

I posted a blog response on:

http://patents.stackexchange.com/questions/5658/interactive-map-is-apple-trying-to-patent-40-year-old-gis-methods-patent-ap

Potential prior art goes back to the very early days of interactive GIS 
applications - as early as the mid to late 1970's. I have user manuals and 
design documents for some of these early systems! Similar potential prior 
art for web deployed apps dates to 1993. In 2002 or so the OGC compiled an 
extensive list of potential prior art related to web mapping. I published an 
article in GIM magazine in 2003 or so.

Cheers

Carl


-----Original Message----- 
From: Venkatesh Raghavan
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2013 11:05 PM
To: OSGeo Discussions ; OSGeo-Board
Subject: [Board] About "Interactive Map" patent application by Apple Inc.

Dear All,

I think the OSGeo should express strong objection to the "Interactive Map"
patent filed by Apple on 17 Dec 2012 [1]. The contents of the patent [1]
describe features that OSGeo software already provides for over a decade.

Best

Venka

[1]
http://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-adv.html&r=2&p=1&f=G&l=50&d=PG01&S1=%28715%2F771.CCLS.+AND+20131219.PD.%29&OS=ccl/715/771+and+pd/12/19/2013&RS=%28CCL/715/771+AND+PD/20131219%29
_______________________________________________
Board mailing list
Board at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board 


_______________________________________________
Board mailing list
Board at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20131222/5c7d6849/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Discuss mailing list