[OSGeo-Discuss] time for inspire committee at osgeo?

[Jachym Cepicky]

OK,

Let's call it "OSGeo SDI committee"

To board: There was proposal to start new committee at OSGeo, which
would be focused (as Jeff and Serena pointed out) at SDI in general.
Now, INSPIRE is big issue to most OSGeo projects and this committee
would take care on it, but it should be focused, as mentioned, more general.

I'll start some wiki page about it and add new item to our agenda for
the next meeting.

Jachym

Dne 15.5.2013 17:48, Jeff McKenna napsal(a):
> Hi Jachym,
> 
> This is a great idea, and I agree is missing as a direct goal by the
> existing OSGeo committees.  As Serena mentioned, it should be focused
> on SDIs in general.  Would you be willing to start a wiki draft of
> this SDI committee? (containing goals, responsibilities, communication
> methods, structure [chair, members],...)
> 
> You can then take that to the Board for their thoughts.
> 
> Thanks for championing this for OSGeo.  (I agree, INSPIRE may be EU
> focused but it affects all of our projects, and there could be other
> global directives that this committee could help guide OSGeo through).
> 
> -jeff
> 
> 
> 
> On 2013-05-15 8:17 AM, Jachym Cepicky wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm working on some presentation about OSGeo relationship to
>> INSPIRE directive (some preliminary czech version of presentation,
>> which should be presented at this years INSPIRE conference [1])
>>
>> And it came to my mind, that OSGeo does not have any body, related
>> to INSPIRE [2]
>>
>> While I agree, INSPIRE is mainly EU-only topic, I think,
>> implementing INSPIRE has big market potential and software, which
>> does not indicate support for INSPIRE is banned from to be used in
>> public organizations in EU. I believe, also "rest of the world" can
>> profit from changes, necessary to be implemented in EU.
>>
>> Therefore I would consider INSPIRE committee in OSGeo as important
>> body, which would coordinate efforts of OSGeo projects towards
>> INSPIRE, so that we could declare: OSGeo projects are INSPIRE ready
>> or we are working on it.
>>
>> Any opinions to this? I'm personally usually against forming "yet 
>> another committee", but in this case, I do not see the topic to be 
>> covered and it really is important issue here.
>>
>> Jachym
>>
>> [1] http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/INSPIRE_conference_2013-paper [2]
>> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/INSPIRE
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> 

-- 
Jachym Cepicky
Help Service - Remote Sensing s.r.o.
jachym.cepicky at gmail.com
HS-RS: jachym at hsrs.cz http://bnhelp.cz
http://les-ejk.cz

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20130515/30cc3105/attachment.pgp>