[OSGeo-Discuss] Gentle reminder reg: Project selection on the new website draft

Wed Aug 16 05:42:42 PDT 2017

Dear all,

I feel that the "tail is wagging the dog" as they say. And we are on the brink of pushing valuable volunteers too far. Again.

Your feed back on the website is needed, welcomed and enlisted, but please be it combined with some actionable way to go forward and a helping hand. The site is still in full progress,  if one looks behind the scenes; there is a really massive content creation thrust going on, the visitor journey experience is enhanced on a daily basis, a multitude of tweaks in progress and ..... the FOSS4Paris and Foss4gBoston preparations had to be done too.

It is not the the Marketing Committee that has to fix anything regarding projects and policy related issues here.
Jody and many others have had to make decisions - lacking input on various occasions- in good faith. Often lacking clear direction and decisions and actual support. This inefficiency has often resulted in rework and loss of volunteer time. The Committee is fully aware that there are still iterations to be done. Up till now they have done something extraordinary, unparalleled in recent OSGeo years. Some slack is in good order.

By the way. The projects that are listed have all an OSI approved license. That has sufficed in the past. Let the free vs open discussion rest till a later date (if it needs to be conducted at all). Subdivisions of projects can be done in various ways: pleasing everyone in our community is a holy grail. 

And again. Please be aware that there is a finite number of volunteer hours in a volunteer day. 

Kind regards,
Marc Vloemans

> Op 16 aug. 2017 om 07:37 heeft Maria Antonia Brovelli <maria.brovelli at polimi.it> het volgende geschreven:
> 
> I agree completely with Helena. It has to be fixed with the highest priority.
> 
> Have a good day,
> 
> Maria
> 
> 
> 
> Pay attention to this Special Issue and see if it is of interest by you:
> http://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijgi/special_issues/Geospatial_Big_Data_Urban_Studies
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Prof. Maria Antonia Brovelli
> Professor of GIS and Remote Sensing
> Politecnico di Milano
> 
> ISPRS WG IV/4 "Collaborative crowdsourced cloud mapping (C3M)" http://www2.isprs.org/commissions/comm4/wg4.html, Board of Directors of OSGeo; GeoForAll Advisory Board; NASA WorldWind Europa Challenge; SIFET Advisory Board
> 
> UN-GGIM Academic Network Deputy Chair, UN-GGIM Italy, UN OpenGIS Initiative (Chair of the Capacity Building WG)
> 
> Sol Katz Award 2015
>  
> P.zza Leonardo da Vinci, 32 - Building 3 - 20133 Milano (Italy)
> Tel. +39-02-23996242 - Mob. +39-328-0023867,  maria.brovelli at polimi.it
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> Da: Discuss <discuss-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> per conto di Helena Mitasova <hmitaso at ncsu.edu>
> Inviato: mercoledì 16 agosto 2017 13:29
> A: Paulo van Breugel
> Cc: OSGeo Discussions; Helmut Kudrnovsky
> Oggetto: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Project selection on the new website draft
>  
> Jody, I have to go so I don't have time to write more but this needs to be fixed instantly to avoid massive backlash against the new website. After so much effort it would be heartbreaking to have a negative reaction just because we would be perceived  as providing advertising platform for projects which are not really free and open source (I guess we will hear more about this from Stallman tomorrow).  
> 
> Helena
> 
>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 7:21 AM, Paulo van Breugel <p.vanbreugel at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 8/16/17 9:32 AM, Jody Garnett wrote:
>>> We could ask the OSGeo live project what procedure they use, at the moment we have asked on the discuss at osgeo.org mailing list for open source projects to fill in a google form so we would have content to try out the website with.
>>> 
>>> There is a very clear distinguishing of OSGeo projects on the website:
>>> 
>>> a) Sort order is OSGeo projects > OSGeo Community > Other
>>> b) Only OSGeo projects are available from the menu directly,
>>> c) When listed OSGeo Projects, and OSGeo Community projects are badged with the appropriate logo
>>> 
>> When I use the link http://osgeo.getinteractive.nl/projects/ directly, I am seeing the page with all projects, with projects in what seems to be random order (and with some of the OSGEO projects, like GRASS, on the last page). Only when I click on 'projects' in the menu am I presented with the projects grouped in Osgeo projects, osgeo community, others. Wouldn't it be preferable to use that page as landing page when using the link http://osgeo.getinteractive.nl/projects/ directly?
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> This is going to be an interesting week collecting feedback when lots of the website is not working as designed quite yet (examples tagging and sorting). To be fair the vast majority of project descriptions were entered last weekend so this is our first chance to try things out with actual content :)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Jody Garnett
>>> 
>>>> On 16 August 2017 at 02:36, Helmut Kudrnovsky <hellik at web.de> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> >Gesendet: Mittwoch, 16. August 2017 um 06:28 Uhr
>>>> >Von: "Jody Garnett"
>>>> >Betreff: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Project selection on the new website draft
>>>> >
>>>> >Not sure it is much of an explanation - our vision as a group is to empower everyone with geospatial - and there is a lot of open source >spatial to promote.
>>>> >
>>>> >By the same vision live.osgeo.org[http://live.osgeo.org] includes all kinds of projects :)
>>>> >
>>>> >The key idea is to help people new to our world to go through the choose a project pages and discover projects that meet their needs. 
>>>> >
>>>> >The website is a beta, we now have enough projects to test out these ideas and see what issues we can find.  There is a meeting tomorrow >with the vendor that should be productive (a hands on training session[https://wiki.osgeo.org
>>>> >/wiki/FOSS4G_2017_Code_Sprint#Website_Training] for any one attending foss4g).
>>>>  
>>>> I'm following the new website and branding process a little bit by the mailing lists.
>>>> 
>>>> is there anywhere a documented discussion or a documented and approved decision about how the project selection to be listed on the OSGeo website is done? I can't find anyone.
>>>> 
>>>> To be inclusive is one side; not to distinguish OSGeo projects from other software projects from other initatives (e.g. locationtech) or GIS vendors without any supplement words in the OSGeo website, I'm feeling unconformable with it.
>>>> 
>>>> Kind regards
>>>> Helmut
>>>> 
>>>> OSGeo charter member
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Discuss mailing list
>>> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Helena Mitasova
> Professor
> Department of Marine, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences
> North Carolina State University
> 1125 Jordan Hall
> NCSU Box 8208
> Raleigh, NC 27695-8208
> http://www4.ncsu.edu/~hmitaso/
> http://geospatial.ncsu.edu/
> 
> email: hmitaso at ncsu.edu
> ph: 919-513-1327 (no voicemail)
> fax 919 515-7802
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20170816/2eebeb18/attachment.html>