[OSGeo-Discuss] Elections 2017 from the CRO point of view

[Bart van den Eijnden]

Very good point Tom.

The only public complaint I've seen about the new process was in this 
board meeting by Jeff: 
http://irclogs.geoapt.com/osgeo/%23osgeo.2017-10-05.log [1]

Vasile, can you maybe shed some light on how many people actually 
complained about it?

Personally I don't think it's a good idea to keep changing the process 
every year, and I'm happy with a more inclusive process (such as the one 
which is in place now).

Best regards,

Bart

[1]
14:16:15 	jmckenna: 	yes i have plans to go back to LimeSurvey and 
voting for 2018 for charter members, requiring 51% 'yes' votes...back to 
our old process. Important that what happened this year never happens 
again: voting process was changed in a closed door meeting.


On 30-10-17 13:27, Tom Chadwin wrote:
> Dear Vasile and all
>
> I've thought long and hard about whether to reply or not, but it has been bothering me, so I guess I must.
>
>> However, during the nomination
>> period, many of our members considered the new membership process way
>> too inclusive/lite, causing a diminution in the importance of the
>> charter member position.
> As one of the intake of this year's new charter members, I find this both insulting and upsetting.
>
>> My recommendations for the future board are to: (a) Change the
>> existing membership process with another one more balanced, that assures
>> both inclusiveness and a consistent weight for the charter member
>> position.
> Where does that leave those of us elected as charter members this year? Are we "lite" members because "many" existing members felt strongly enough about protecting the exclusivity of their position to complain privately to the CRO, but not strongly enough to express that opinion openly so that it could be discussed?
>
> I really feel for Vasile that people expressed such a potentially toxic opinion, thereby absolving themselves of the responsibility of putting their names to it, while presumably expecting him to raise it himself, as he has so professionally done.
>
> I was extremely proud to have been nominated and generously seconded. Recognition and reputation are significant parts of open-source currency. However, this attitude creates the impression that membership is a self-serving clique.
>
> I would have been happy to have gone through a more rigorous nomination process. However I, and many of my colleagues - many much, much more respected than me - did not, through no fault of our own.
>
> Let me make this clear: this issue and the way in which it has been raised, coupled with the white western board election results (concern about which I absolutely share), and also the unpleasant flavour of the board election through the situation with Jeff are making me question whether I should retain the charter membership I was so proud to attain.
>
> Yours in frustration
>
> Tom
>
>
> Tom Chadwin, ICT Manager
> Telephone: 01434 611530 Mob:
> Web: www.northumberlandnationalpark.org.uk<http://www.northumberlandnationalpark.org.uk/>
>
> IMPORTANT NOTICE - Disclaimer - This communication is from Northumberland National Park Authority (NNPA).The Authority’s head office and principal place of business is Eastburn, South Park, Hexham, Northumberland, NE46 1BS, United Kingdom. If you are not the intended recipient(s) please note that any form of disclosure, distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it or in any attachments is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please delete the email and destroy any copies of it. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of NNPA.Contractors or potential contractors are reminded that a formal Order or Contract is needed for NNPA to be bound by any offer or acceptance of terms for the supply of goods or services Although this email and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defects which might affect any computer or IT system into which they are received, no responsibility is accepted by the NNPA for any loss or damage arising in any way from the receipt or use thereof. Computer systems of this Authority may be monitored and communications carried out on them recorded, to secure the effective operation of the system and for other lawful purpose.
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20171030/d360c281/attachment.html>