[OSGeo-Discuss] GeoServer CITE Test Automation Request for Proposal
Jody Garnett
jody.garnett at gmail.com
Thu Dec 12 06:10:47 PST 2019
I have updated the GSIP-176
<https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GISP-176> now to reflect the
successful bid, the pdf
<https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-176/automation_proposal.pdf>
is attached (in the tasks section).
--
Jody Garnett
On Thu, 12 Dec 2019 at 12:22, Jody Garnett <jody.garnett at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you Dirk,
>
> Updated for today is that the PSC has select a successful proposal form
> GeoSolutions, and I confirmed I can upload this proposal to our wiki for
> interested parties.
>
> Our RFP outlined a solid requirement to work with the CITE Team repos as
> provided (and not fork this time). So expect some more
> collaboration/feedback from our community.
>
>
> We would really like to see the CITE team participate i our OSGeo
> community sprints and collaborate directly on these activities. Indeed CITE
> took part in last years sprint and worked a bit on the OSGeo "incubation"
> graduation checklist which was great to see (CITE is part of the osgeo
> community projects, and was accepted into the incubation process but has
> not shown much progress yet).
>
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
>
> On Thu, 12 Dec 2019 at 11:14, Dirk Stenger <stenger at lat-lon.de> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jody and everyone else working on this activity,
>>
>> We, as CITE Lead Compliance Tools, are very much in favor of this idea.
>> This is, in our opinion, a good example how OSGeo projects can work
>> together and benefit from each other. Of course, we are interested in the
>> results of this activity as this is also a great opportunity for TEAM
>> Engine and related test suites to advance and to get more known.
>>
>> So, if you have any questions or if you need help, you are very much
>> welcome to contact us. The OGC CITE team is willing to support the activity
>> as much as possible.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Dirk
>>
>>
>>
>> Am 11.12.19 um 18:11 schrieb Torsten Friebe:
>>
>> That would be great to have a central Jenkins CI instance at OSGeo
>> infrastructure. Having such a docker based test environment for all OSGeo
>> projects implementing OGC standards would definitely ease the check for
>> compliance.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Torsten
>> Am 10.12.19 um 20:58 schrieb Jody Garnett:
>>
>> Well in this case we have had several false starts, simply too big an
>> activity to tackle on volunteer time.
>>
>> The GeoServer PSC is voting on a received proposal now, primarily based
>> around docker images. The resulting work will be public (and could be
>> adapted to a Jenkins instances hosted by SAC for example).
>> --
>> Jody Garnett
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 10 Dec 2019 at 12:14, Torsten Friebe <friebe at lat-lon.de> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Jody,
>>>
>>> That's an interesting activity. The deegree project has an similar
>>> outstanding issue: https://github.com/deegree/deegree3/issues/773
>>>
>>> It would be great to learn how the GeoServer project is going to
>>> implement this.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> Torsten
>>> Am 13.11.19 um 07:04 schrieb Jody Garnett:
>>>
>>> The correct link is https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-176
>>>
>>> I would also like to thank everyone who has supported this activity via
>>> sponsorship and donation. Special thanks to sponsors Gaia3D, and OSGeo.UK
>>> for help making this activity possible.
>>> --
>>> Jody Garnett
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, 12 Nov 2019 at 22:00, Jody Garnett <jody.garnett at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> GeoServer PSC has an outstanding maintenance activity
>>>> <https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/CITE-Test-Upgrade> to
>>>> automate CITE testing for our build server and have put together a budget
>>>> of between $10,000 and $12,000 USD towards this activity.
>>>>
>>>> If you or your organization is interested in this work please respond
>>>> to the geoserver-devel email list with your proposal by the end of
>>>> November. Applicants are welcome to attend bi-weekly GeoServer meeting for
>>>> any clarification of requirements and participate in the review process.
>>>> For details, including detailed requirements, see GISP-176
>>>> <https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GISP-176>.
>>>> --
>>>> GeoServer Project Steering Committee
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Discuss mailing listDiscuss at lists.osgeo.orghttps://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>>
>>> --
>>> l a t / l o n GmbH
>>> Aennchenstrasse 19 53177 Bonn, Germany
>>> phone ++49 +228 9477 9877 fax ++49 +228 9477 0154http://www.lat-lon.de http://www.deegree.org
>>>
>>> lat/lon gesellschaft für raumbezogene informationssysteme mbH
>>> Registergericht: Amtsgericht Bonn, HRB 13042
>>> Geschäftsführer: Jens Fitzke und Torsten Friebe
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Discuss mailing list
>>> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>> --
>> l a t / l o n GmbH
>> Aennchenstrasse 19 53177 Bonn, Germany
>> phone ++49 +228 9477 9877 fax ++49 +228 9477 0154http://www.lat-lon.de http://www.deegree.org
>>
>> lat/lon gesellschaft für raumbezogene informationssysteme mbH
>> Registergericht: Amtsgericht Bonn, HRB 13042
>> Geschäftsführer: Jens Fitzke und Torsten Friebe
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing listDiscuss at lists.osgeo.orghttps://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>> --
>> l a t / l o n GmbH
>> Aennchenstrasse 19 53177 Bonn, Germany
>> phone ++49 +228 9477 9877 fax ++49 +228 9477 0154http://www.lat-lon.de http://www.deegree.org
>>
>> lat/lon gesellschaft für raumbezogene informationssysteme mbH
>> Registergericht: Amtsgericht Bonn, HRB 13042
>> Geschäftsführer: Jens Fitzke und Torsten Friebe
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20191212/a095d541/attachment.html>
More information about the Discuss
mailing list