<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-15">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1505" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY style="MARGIN: 4px 4px 1px; FONT: 10pt Microsoft Sans Serif">
<DIV>All,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Why not simply have an all OSGEO conference.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>No reason not to have or be a part of FOSS4G. But it sounds like there is enough interest in having a conference with a OSGEO bent as well.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>bobb</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><BR><BR>>>> Tyler Mitchell <tylermitchell@shaw.ca> wrote:<BR></DIV>
<DIV style="PADDING-LEFT: 7px; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 15px; BORDER-LEFT: #050505 1px solid; BACKGROUND-COLOR: #f3f3f3">On 28-Mar-07, at 10:36 PM, Jeroen Ticheler wrote:<BR><BR>><BR>That said, with my marketing hat on, I'd love to see all OSGeo <BR>projects get a priority in workshop submissions. How would this look <BR>from year to year? Does it just become same old projects doing same <BR>old presentations year after year? Or would we only give newly <BR>joined projects from the last year the opportunity to showcase in a <BR>workshop? Better yet, how about projects that have recently <BR>graduated from incubation! Then there is some more incentive to get <BR>through it. Now I think we're on to something....<BR><BR>Tyler<BR><BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>Discuss mailing list<BR>Discuss@lists.osgeo.org<BR><A href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss</A><BR></DIV></BODY></HTML>