<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">This is an interesting idea. I think it would have to be a case where an existing OSGeo project (I think what you're calling the "Super" project) expects this smaller project to have an important future as a viable OSGeo project. The PSC of the sponsoring project (say Mapserver, Mapguide or OpenLayers) would have to be willing to invest some time in nurturing this project towards the start of an incubation process.<div><br></div><div>I think we would want to make it clear however that these smaller projects are not OSGeo projects -- as this would dilute the value of projects that have graduated incubation and are recognized as strong healthy projects. This is one of the most important roles for OSGeo -- to help provide legitimacy to projects for those outside looking into the OSGeo domain.</div><div><div><br></div><div>There have been a few projects that have already started down this path -- but there really isn't a lot of structure in place to define how this would be done. It might be interesting to have for the future though.</div><div><br></div><div>Dave<br><div apple-content-edited="true"> <span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; border-spacing: 0px 0px; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; text-align: auto; -khtml-text-decorations-in-effect: none; text-indent: 0px; -apple-text-size-adjust: auto; text-transform: none; orphans: 2; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; "><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -khtml-nbsp-mode: space; -khtml-line-break: after-white-space; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; border-spacing: 0px 0px; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; text-align: auto; -khtml-text-decorations-in-effect: none; text-indent: 0px; -apple-text-size-adjust: auto; text-transform: none; orphans: 2; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; "><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div></span></div></span> </div><br><div><div>On 12-Sep-08, at 11:41 AM, Bob Basques wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div style="MARGIN: 4px 4px 1px; FONT: 10pt Comic Sans MS"> <div>All,</div> <div> </div> <div>I have a question about a possible way to get some smaller projects into the system without the requirements of going full bore (as I perceive it now) I'm not really targeting any project per se at this point, but . . .</div> <div> </div> <div>What about have a "Super" project that can act as a sponsor for a smaller project. When I say smaller, I mean where there might only be one, two or three developers. The end result being that the "Super" project basically vouches for the smaller project in some fashion for it to get some sort of OSGEO stamp applied to it. This could possibly be a criteria where some of the established vetting is handled via a voucher system, where other "Super" projects can add their credentials to the mix over time.</div> <div> </div> <div>Just a thought, still a little muddled too, but it seems like there might be something workable in the concept. Any other thoughts?</div> <div> </div> <div>bobb</div> <div> </div> <div> </div></div> _______________________________________________<br>Discuss mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Discuss@lists.osgeo.org">Discuss@lists.osgeo.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss</a><br></blockquote></div><br></div></div></body></html>