<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><br><div><div>On Jun 11, 2011, at 8:24 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite">
<div bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Mark,<br>
Yes I agree that OSGeo-Live also provides a good framework for the
periodic review of projects beyond incubation.<br>
<br>
What we have on our side is:<br>
1. A periodic release schedule<br>
2. A valuable business driver which attracts projects to continue to
work on OSGeo-Live (namely the marketing value of each release)<br>
<br>
We do have the potential to <b>gradually</b> introduce review of
incubation criteria into the OSGeo-Live release cycle.<br>
<br></div></blockquote></div><br><div>I was actually thinking of the reverse - incubation graduation would be contingent on getting on the OSGeo-Live disk. Agree it should be gradual, should start out as a goal.</div><div><br></div><div>Mark</div><div><br></div></body></html>