<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">HI all,<br>
      <br>
      As there is a request for Charter Members to chime in, here my 2
      cents:<br>
      <br>
      The issue on hand is highlighting excellently the need for
      effective and efficient decision procedures based on mandates.<br>
      OSGeo has but embarked on establishing these, currently
      discussions are driven more by gut feeling than by ordered bylaws
      and procedures. The fact that there are projects in incubation for
      4.5 years [1] and still not done underlines this.<br>
      <br>
      A grassroots mindset is good for gathering people initially, but
      to exercise impact at large we need efficient, agreed decision
      structures. With some of the last posts I see that we are
      embarking in this direction, and I very much applaude to that.<br>
      <br>
      cheers,<br>
      Peter<br>
      <br>
      [1] <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://rasdaman.org/wiki/OSGeo">http://rasdaman.org/wiki/OSGeo</a><br>
      <br>
      <br>
      On 09/18/2014 09:59 AM, Ravi Kumar wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:1411027159.74431.YahooMailNeo@web125102.mail.ne1.yahoo.com"
      type="cite">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
        charset=windows-1252">
      <div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: rgb(255, 255,
        255); font-size: 10pt;">This ' LocationTech and OSGeo
        collaboration ', appears to be some thing that the OSGeo Charter
        should involve and motivate opinion etc. Those at the helm may
        pl post a summary of the, 'storey so far'. 
        <div id="yiv8298223418">
          <div>
            <div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 10pt;
              background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">
              <div id="yiv8298223418yui_3_16_0_8_1411024810920_4"><span
                  id="yiv8298223418yui_3_16_0_8_1411024810920_11"></span></div>
              <div class="qtdSeparateBR"><br>
                <br>
              </div>
              <div class="yiv8298223418yqt9990828533"
                id="yiv8298223418yqt78954">
                <div class="yiv8298223418yahoo_quoted"
                  id="yiv8298223418yui_3_16_0_8_1411024810920_7"
                  style="display: block;">
                  <div
                    class="yiv8298223418yui_3_16_0_1_1411024810920_8474"
                    style="font-size: 10pt;">
                    <div
                      class="yiv8298223418yui_3_16_0_1_1411024810920_8475"
                      style="font-size: 12pt;">
                      <div dir="ltr"> On Thursday, September 18, 2014
                        2:23 AM, Jachym Cepicky
                        <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:jachym.cepicky@gmail.com"><jachym.cepicky@gmail.com></a> wrote:<br
                          clear="none">
                      </div>
                      <br clear="none">
                      <br clear="none">
                      <div class="yiv8298223418y_msg_container">Just
                        noting,<br clear="none">
                        <br clear="none">
                        discussion about relationship between
                        LocationTech and OSGeo is here<br clear="none">
                        since 2012 (IIRC). That many people did not pain
                        attention to it<br clear="none">
                        (actually including myself up to certain time),
                        is not fault of OSGeo<br clear="none">
                        .. or LocationTech.<br clear="none">
                        <br clear="none">
                        It's just actually boring topic. We are
                        community of (mostly)<br clear="none">
                        developers and users of FOSS4G (not conference,
                        but software in this<br clear="none">
                        case). This sounds like politics .. who would
                        pay attention? So, now<br clear="none">
                        we are here, things are happening, we can
                        finally talk to whole<br clear="none">
                        community, because of this IMHO *is* important
                        topic - two big<br clear="none">
                        organisations are trying to find a way, how to
                        cooperate in the future<br clear="none">
                        for better free and open source software for
                        geospatial! This is good.<br clear="none">
                        If for nothing else, then for clarifying OSGeo's
                        position.<br clear="none">
                        <br clear="none">
                        Jachym<br clear="none">
                        <br clear="none">
                        2014-09-17 22:42 GMT+02:00 P Kishor <<a
                          moz-do-not-send="true" rel="nofollow"
                          shape="rect"
                          ymailto="mailto:punk.kish@gmail.com"
                          target="_blank"
                          href="mailto:punk.kish@gmail.com">punk.kish@gmail.com</a>>:<br
                          clear="none">
                        > My guess is, just as I do, most Charter
                        Members find this entire thread very<br
                          clear="none">
                        > alien. For us who don't go to FOSS4G, OSGeo
                        means something completely<br clear="none">
                        > different (here is where I disagree with an
                        earlier email--I think it was Jo<br clear="none">
                        > Cook--that folks know OSGeo products but
                        not OSGeo). To suddenly hear of all<br
                          clear="none">
                        > this chatter about FOSS4G being used as a
                        football between OSGeo and<br clear="none">
                        > LocationTech (an org I heard about for the
                        first time also in this thread)<br clear="none">
                        > is like waking up at night to find a bunch
                        of strangers chatting in your<br clear="none">
                        > living room.<br clear="none">
                        ><br clear="none">
                        > Definitely, involving Charter Members would
                        be a very sound and nice thing<br clear="none">
                        > to do.<br clear="none">
                        ><br clear="none">
                        > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Steven
                        Feldman <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                          rel="nofollow" shape="rect"
                          ymailto="mailto:shfeldman@gmail.com"
                          target="_blank"
                          href="mailto:shfeldman@gmail.com">shfeldman@gmail.com</a>>

                        wrote:<br clear="none">
                        >><br clear="none">
                        >> Before we get to the stage of polling
                        charter members and local chapters,<br
                          clear="none">
                        >> it would be helpful if more of the
                        charter membership and local chapters<br
                          clear="none">
                        >> chipped in with their opinions. Many
                        seem to have been very quiet, i am sure<br
                          clear="none">
                        >> they must have a view<br clear="none">
                        >> ______<br clear="none">
                        >> Steven<br clear="none">
                        >><br clear="none">
                        >><br clear="none">
                        >> On 17 Sep 2014, at 20:00, <a
                          moz-do-not-send="true" rel="nofollow"
                          shape="rect"
                          ymailto="mailto:conference-europe-request@lists.osgeo.org"
                          target="_blank"
                          href="mailto:conference-europe-request@lists.osgeo.org">conference-europe-request@lists.osgeo.org</a>
                        wrote:<br clear="none">
                        >><br clear="none">
                        >> From: Massimiliano Cannata <<a
                          moz-do-not-send="true" rel="nofollow"
                          shape="rect"
                          ymailto="mailto:massimiliano.cannata@supsi.ch"
                          target="_blank"
                          href="mailto:massimiliano.cannata@supsi.ch">massimiliano.cannata@supsi.ch</a>><br
                          clear="none">
                        >> Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Hacking
                        OSGeo<br clear="none">
                        >> Date: 17 September 2014 19:22:24 BST<br
                          clear="none">
                        >> To: P Kishor <<a
                          moz-do-not-send="true" rel="nofollow"
                          shape="rect"
                          ymailto="mailto:punk.kish@gmail.com"
                          target="_blank"
                          href="mailto:punk.kish@gmail.com">punk.kish@gmail.com</a>><br
                          clear="none">
                        >> Cc: OSGeo Discussions <<a
                          moz-do-not-send="true" rel="nofollow"
                          shape="rect"
                          ymailto="mailto:discuss@lists.osgeo.org"
                          target="_blank"
                          href="mailto:discuss@lists.osgeo.org">discuss@lists.osgeo.org</a>><br
                          clear="none">
                        >><br clear="none">
                        >><br clear="none">
                        >> Puneet,<br clear="none">
                        >> I agree with you, this is an "hot"
                        decision that cannot be taken by a<br
                          clear="none">
                        >> small group of people without at least
                        have heard about what the OSGeo<br clear="none">
                        >> community think about.<br clear="none">
                        >><br clear="none">
                        >> In this tread I have learnt a lot on
                        LocationTech and on motivation that<br
                          clear="none">
                        >> pushed some OSGeo members to embrace
                        also LocationTech. I can really feel<br
                          clear="none">
                        >> the desire to help and foster
                        geospatial open source software from those<br
                          clear="none">
                        >> guys.<br clear="none">
                        >><br clear="none">
                        >> BTW, I also believe that FOSS4G is the
                        OSGeo event.<br clear="none">
                        >><br clear="none">
                        >> For this reason I believe that if OSGeo
                        want to change things and share it<br
                          clear="none">
                        >> with LocationTech (not just let them
                        organize it in the name of), we need a<br
                          clear="none">
                        >> deep OSGeo internal discussion at all
                        level: Local Chapters, Charter<br clear="none">
                        >> members, Committees and finally the
                        Board which has the responsibility to<br
                          clear="none">
                        >> vote on this.<br clear="none">
                        >><br clear="none">
                        >> So, my proposal is:<br clear="none">
                        >> 1) Have a formal proposal from
                        LocationTech which explain terms of<br
                          clear="none">
                        >> collaboration, commitments and
                        guarantees<br clear="none">
                        >> 2) Publish publicly this proposal for a
                        period (let's say 2 week) for<br clear="none">
                        >> people to look into this proposal<br
                          clear="none">
                        >> 3) Call for a vote from charter members<br
                          clear="none">
                        >> 4) Call for a letter of position letter
                        from each committee and local<br clear="none">
                        >> Chapters<br clear="none">
                        >> 5) Publish publicly the results<br
                          clear="none">
                        >> 6) Discuss it on the next board meeting
                        and finally have a vote and a<br clear="none">
                        >> letter of motivation from the Board<br
                          clear="none">
                        >><br clear="none">
                        >><br clear="none">
                        >> BTW, the FOSS4G-EUROPE website (<a
                          moz-do-not-send="true" rel="nofollow"
                          shape="rect" target="_blank"
                          href="http://foss4g-e.org/">http://foss4g-e.org/</a>)
                        states clearly at<br clear="none">
                        >> the home page: "OSGeo's European
                        Conference on Free and Open Source Software<br
                          clear="none">
                        >> for Geospatial".<br clear="none">
                        >><br clear="none">
                        >><br clear="none">
                        >> I hope this doesn't hurt anyone, and
                        brings positive point of discussion.<br
                          clear="none">
                        >><br clear="none">
                        >> It is just my personal thought as a new
                        board member, and sorry if I've<br clear="none">
                        >> lost some best practice currently in
                        place.<br clear="none">
                        >><br clear="none">
                        >> Maxi<br clear="none">
                        >><br clear="none">
                        >><br clear="none">
                        >><br clear="none">
                        >><br clear="none">
                        >>
                        _______________________________________________<br
                          clear="none">
                        >> Discuss mailing list<br clear="none">
                        >> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                          rel="nofollow" shape="rect"
                          ymailto="mailto:Discuss@lists.osgeo.org"
                          target="_blank"
                          href="mailto:Discuss@lists.osgeo.org">Discuss@lists.osgeo.org</a><br
                          clear="none">
                        >> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                          rel="nofollow" shape="rect" target="_blank"
                          href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss</a><br
                          clear="none">
                        ><br clear="none">
                        ><br clear="none">
                        ><br clear="none">
                        ><br clear="none">
                        > --<br clear="none">
                        > Puneet Kishor<br clear="none">
                        > Manager, Science and Data Policy<br
                          clear="none">
                        > Creative Commons<br clear="none">
                        ><br clear="none">
                        >
                        _______________________________________________<br
                          clear="none">
                        > Discuss mailing list<br clear="none">
                        > <a moz-do-not-send="true" rel="nofollow"
                          shape="rect"
                          ymailto="mailto:Discuss@lists.osgeo.org"
                          target="_blank"
                          href="mailto:Discuss@lists.osgeo.org">Discuss@lists.osgeo.org</a><br
                          clear="none">
                        > <a moz-do-not-send="true" rel="nofollow"
                          shape="rect" target="_blank"
                          href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss</a><br
                          clear="none">
                        <br clear="none">
                        <br clear="none">
                        <br clear="none">
                        -- <br clear="none">
                        Jachym Cepicky<br clear="none">
                        e-mail: jachym.cepicky gmail com<br clear="none">
                        URL: <a moz-do-not-send="true" rel="nofollow"
                          shape="rect" target="_blank"
                          href="http://les-ejk.cz/">http://les-ejk.cz</a><br
                          clear="none">
                        GPG: <a moz-do-not-send="true" rel="nofollow"
                          shape="rect" target="_blank"
                          href="http://les-ejk.cz/pgp/JachymCepicky.pgp">http://les-ejk.cz/pgp/JachymCepicky.pgp</a><br
                          clear="none">
                        <br clear="none">
                        Give your code freedom with PyWPS - <a
                          moz-do-not-send="true" rel="nofollow"
                          shape="rect" target="_blank"
                          href="http://pywps.wald.intevation.org/">http://pywps.wald.intevation.org</a><br
                          clear="none">
                        _______________________________________________<br
                          clear="none">
                        Discuss mailing list<br clear="none">
                        <a moz-do-not-send="true" rel="nofollow"
                          shape="rect"
                          ymailto="mailto:Discuss@lists.osgeo.org"
                          target="_blank"
                          href="mailto:Discuss@lists.osgeo.org">Discuss@lists.osgeo.org</a><br
                          clear="none">
                        <a moz-do-not-send="true" rel="nofollow"
                          shape="rect" target="_blank"
                          href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss</a><br
                          clear="none">
                        <br clear="none">
                        <br clear="none">
                      </div>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
        <div>Ravi Kumar</div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Discuss@lists.osgeo.org">Discuss@lists.osgeo.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss</a></pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="80">-- 
Dr. Peter Baumann
 - Professor of Computer Science, Jacobs University Bremen
   <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.faculty.jacobs-university.de/pbaumann">www.faculty.jacobs-university.de/pbaumann</a>
   mail: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:p.baumann@jacobs-university.de">p.baumann@jacobs-university.de</a>
   tel: +49-421-200-3178, fax: +49-421-200-493178
 - Executive Director, rasdaman GmbH Bremen (HRB 26793)
   <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.rasdaman.com">www.rasdaman.com</a>, mail: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:baumann@rasdaman.com">baumann@rasdaman.com</a>
   tel: 0800-rasdaman, fax: 0800-rasdafax, mobile: +49-173-5837882
"Si forte in alienas manus oberraverit hec peregrina epistola incertis ventis dimissa, sed Deo commendata, precamur ut ei reddatur cui soli destinata, nec preripiat quisquam non sibi parata." (mail disclaimer, AD 1083)


</pre>
  </body>
</html>