<div dir="ltr"><div>I would agree with Jonathan's point of view. Yes, Asian's team put together unfortunate list of keynoters (from one point of view). Dar team did the same the opposite way around and apparently fully consciously (nothing against any of the speakers, this is the LOC decision).</div><div><br></div><div>Leave it for now and try to be better next time. But, remember "better next time" is different (diverse) for everybody else.<br></div><div><br></div><div>J</div><div><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">so 11. 8. 2018 v 12:51 odesílatel Jonathan Moules <<a href="mailto:jonathan-lists@lightpear.com">jonathan-lists@lightpear.com</a>> napsal:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>Glass-half-full observation: In a topic talking about the FOSS4G
Asia diversity, no-one has commented on the commendable range of
racial diversity in those keynotes.</p>
<p>As to gender in keynotes, a Devils Advocate would point out there
is no gender diversity in the 2018 Dar es Salaam keynote speakers
either (assuming the four on the <a href="http://2018.foss4g.org" target="_blank">2018.foss4g.org</a> front page) -
they're also all the same gender. Except that given the gender
disparity in this field, it seems reasonable to me to conclude
that Dar have probably done this intentionally whereas Asia's
seems statistically plausible without even needing to factor in
unconscious biases.<br>
</p>
And what of diversity of age? I'm fairly confident in guessing that
the Asia keynotes are all 40s-50s. I'm less confident guessing
Dar's, but I'd say in their 20's to 30's.<br>
<br>
Definition (from the OED):<br>
Diverse (Adj), "<span class="m_-2180106877292549897ind">Showing a great deal of variety;
very different.</span>"<br>
<br>
By that definition, neither have gender diversity, both have racial
diversity (Asia's more-so), and both have little age diversity.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Jonathan<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="m_-2180106877292549897moz-cite-prefix">On 2018-08-09 10:43, María Arias de
Reyna wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre>I agree this is a good topic to bring into the open, and not an easy
one. For what I have seen, FOSS4G Asia organization is doing a good
job, this is just a hard subject to address. Even if that keynote
lineup was full of women (like in main FOSS4G!) we still have to check
about the rest of speakers and the attendees. But you are right,
adding at least one woman keynoter can make a difference.
For those of you who may be reading this and need some context, this
is a long-distance race, not a sprint. Reaching outside your comfort
zone networks (usually mostly male contacts in the case of male
developers) to get more women speakers is not something you can do on
a blink. Specially if the organizers didn't have the problem in mind
when the organization started. We usually say that if you start
worrying about diversity after you choose the venue, you are already
too late.
I will be in FOSS4G Asia and I hope to get in contact with the
organization to know about their idiosyncrasy, their worries and their
challenges. Trying to help from here is difficult, as my networks are
mostly european and american. But still, we can work together in
strategies and how to improve diversity. I am going to give a talk
with Malena on Tanzania about general strategies and how to work on
improving diversity and my plan is to write down later whatever comes
from that conversation so we have some guidelines or good practices
that any OSGeo event can use.
Maybe it is time we renew the woman@osgeo mailing list to join forces?
On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 12:25 AM, Jody Garnett <a class="m_-2180106877292549897moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:jody.garnett@gmail.com" target="_blank"><jody.garnett@gmail.com></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre>Hey Mark, good on you for voicing publicly. Our ability to discuss openly is
a strength of our community, and one we are learning to use responsibly. I
saw your tweet yesterday, but find the discussion list more useful for
internal discussion such as this.
It is a hard balance between requesting or encouraging changes we want to
see vs expressing dissapointment in the activities of others. This is
especially important in a volunteer organization such as ours where
disappointment however kindly expressed can hit really moral hard
(especially as volunteers are pulling an event together).
I have been on both sides of this balance and it is never comfortable, as
you express in your struggle above. Ideally, I seek to offer my time if I am
in position to be of assistance and if the assistance is welcome. If not in
a position to help I seek to learn or look for an opportunity for feedback.
I learned a lot as your foss4g event planning has unfolded and your
challenges, priorities and direction became clear.
It is my hope that we will learn what challenges the foss4g-asia event is
facing and what we as an organization can do to assist.
If you have been following the board meetings the Sri Lanka chapter is just
being officially recognized (and the membership shows some diversity). OSGeo
has also set aside funding for our president to attend the foss4g-asia
event.
--
Jody Garnett
On Wed, 8 Aug 2018 at 14:53, Mark Iliffe <a class="m_-2180106877292549897moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:markiliffe@gmail.com" target="_blank"><markiliffe@gmail.com></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre>
Hi All,
I’ve really agonised over whether to send this email. First of which,
being the imminent final preparations for FOSS4G taking up a lot of time,
but also whether it’s appropriate for me in my role of chair of FOOS4G to
offer public critique of regional events. It is in this vein that I’d like
to really stress that I’m writing this as an OSSGeo charter member.
When I first saw this, my heart sank:
<a class="m_-2180106877292549897moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.foss4g-asia.org/2018/keynotes/" target="_blank">http://www.foss4g-asia.org/2018/keynotes/</a>
Where is the gender diversity in the line up? I know that organising a
FOSS4G is really difficult, but we need to be reaching far and wide and that
starts with our keynotes. Potentially I’m missing something here - and I
probably am, if so I am sorry if this is the case! - but can we have a
rethink of the line up to really represent our community?
Thank you,
Mark
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<pre>_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
<a class="m_-2180106877292549897moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Discuss@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">Discuss@lists.osgeo.org</a>
<a class="m_-2180106877292549897moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss" target="_blank">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
Discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Discuss@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">Discuss@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss</a></blockquote></div><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">Jachym Cepicky<br>e-mail: jachym.cepicky gmail com<br>URL: <a href="http://les-ejk.cz" target="_blank">http://les-ejk.cz</a><br>GPG: <a href="http://les-ejk.cz/pgp/JachymCepicky.pgp" target="_blank">http://les-ejk.cz/pgp/JachymCepicky.pgp</a><br></div>