[El] GDAL 1.7.3 in elgis-testing

[Viji V Nair]

Hi

The GDAL with image-io extension need a patched Java and preferably Sun Java.

You have mentioned that you need a clean version, Options are:

1. Complete Clean Version - Regular jnis, no maven2, no sun java, no patching
2. With patch and sun java - no maven

Thanks
Viji

Also, have u got a chance to test the gdal-grass plugin?


On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Mathieu Baudier <mbaudier at argeo.org> wrote:
> Hi Viji, Ralph,
>
> should I merge the two spec files (the one from Ralph with imageio-ext
> and the one from Viji for Fedora) or do we want to have the
> imageio-ext stuff first merged into the Fedora spec file?
>
> I can always merge the two (and probably soon will) and that won't be
> too hard to synchronize with Fedora later on.
> I just wanted to check again.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mathieu
>
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 11:25, Mathieu Baudier <mbaudier at argeo.org> wrote:
>> This spec file does not contain the imageio-ext build done by Ralph.
>>
>> See:
>> https://projects.argeo.org/elgis/svn/factory/trunk/rpmbuild/elgis/gdal/SPECS/gdal.spec?r=121
>> for the current version.
>>
>> Are these imageio parts specific to EL5, or should they also be
>> reported to Fedora?
>>
>> There is no hurry to answer/solve this. GDAL proper is currently
>> usable in testing.
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 11:00, Viji V Nair <viji at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>>> sorry, missed the attachment.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Viji
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Mathieu Baudier <mbaudier at argeo.org> wrote:
>>>>>> ANOTHER option would be to package the poms and depmap frags into an
>>>>>> additional subpackage "gdal-java-poms" or "gdal-java-maven2", sort of
>>>>>> "If you want to use gdal-java properly with maven2, you should install
>>>>>> gdal-java-maven2, which of course requires maven2". That would be clean.
>>>>>
>>>>> I like this.
>>>>> If there is a clean way and the only cost is just another small
>>>>> package, I find it worth the (little) effort.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> But then that would not be a subpackage, but rather a full-fledged
>>>> package in elgis-plus.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> el mailing list
>>>> el at lists.osgeo.org
>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/el
>>>>
>>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> el mailing list
> el at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/el
>