[El] RPM package for mod_geocache

[Mathieu Baudier]

Hi Peter,

I'm currently working on building/deploying your packages through the
"official" elgis factory.
TinyOWS went smoothly (i haven't deployed it, because I do the
signing/release in batch)

But for mod_geocache, do you know which SVN revision you took?
Or should I take the latest?
Shouldn't we ask Thomas (the developer) to do a release, since he made
an announcement on the osgeo-discuss mailing-list?

As already discussed, I think we should (try to) push upstream
projects to do releases, even if just RCs, or milestones, so that
users and developers can speak the same language.

Anyhow, I have no issue with taking SVN revisions in testing, but I
wouldlike to use the one you are testing.

- either we say that the revision IS the version: mod_geocache-0037
(but later updates may be a pain when they start versioning properly)
- or we already have an idea of which versioning scheme he plans to
use, and we use the revision to qualify it: mod_geocache-0.0.1-r37

Comments/ideas welcome!

Mathieu

On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:59, Peter Hopfgartner
<peter.hopfgartner at r3-gis.com> wrote:
> I've assembled an preliminary RPM package for mod_geocache:
>
> For the time being they will be available at:
>
> http://www.r3-gis.com/upload/mod_geocache-0.0.1-1.el5.src.rpm
> http://www.r3-gis.com/upload/mod_geocache-0.0.1-1.el5.x86_64.rpm
> http://www.r3-gis.com/upload/mod_geocache-debuginfo-0.0.1-1.el5.x86_64.rpm
>
> Do not use them for production:
>  * this is my first Apache module packaging, ever
>  * Packaging is less then alpha, anyways
>  * and the code is taken from the subversion repo.
>
> Feedback welcomed!
>
> Have fun,
>
> Peter Hopfgartner
>
> R3 GIS Srl - GmbH
> http://www.r3-gis.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> el mailing list
> el at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/el
>