<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Re: [El] map.vim [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'>Peter,<BR>
<BR>
If it is not much effort, I’d like to see map.vim included at least as an option.<BR>
<BR>
Bruce<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
On 4/11/10 8:17 PM, "Peter Hopfgartner" <<a href="peter.hopfgartner@r3-gis.com">peter.hopfgartner@r3-gis.com</a>> wrote:<BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT><BLOCKQUOTE><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'>Well, there are more important issues. Let's drop the proposal.<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
Peter<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
R3 GIS Srl - GmbH<BR>
<BR>
<a href="http://www.r3-gis.com">http://www.r3-gis.com</a><BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
--------Mathieu Baudier <<a href="mbaudier@argeo.org">mbaudier@argeo.org</a>> wrote--------<BR>
<BR>
Subject: Re: [El] map.vim<BR>
<BR>
Date: 03.11.2010 21:18<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
>> Neither Debian's nor Ubuntu's mapserver package contain a map.vim.<BR>
<BR>
><BR>
<BR>
>This is a strong argument since we definitely want to be consistent<BR>
<BR>
>with similar efforts for other distributions.<BR>
<BR>
><BR>
<BR>
>That would also be nice to stay not too far away from Fedora, since in<BR>
<BR>
>early EL 6 a lot of the Fedora packages will probably be available in<BR>
<BR>
>EPEL and we may not duplicate the effort in ELGIS.<BR>
<BR>
><BR>
<BR>
>Just sharing thoughts, I don't really have an opinion on this<BR>
<BR>
>particular point, since I probably won't be using it and it doesn't<BR>
<BR>
>have a big impact.<BR>
<BR>
><BR>
<BR>
_______________________________________________<BR>
el mailing list<BR>
<a href="el@lists.osgeo.org">el@lists.osgeo.org</a><BR>
<a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/el">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/el</a><BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>
</BODY>
</HTML>