[fdo-internals] PSC: Interesting Conundrum

[Greg Boone]

Why not add tools as a equal to core and utilities under fdo (see below)
and have a single make build process that builds everything? Making it
an equal of fdo only complicates the build and makes things a little
harder to find as you browse the repository.

- trunk
-- fdo
--- tools
--- core
--- utilities
--- thirdparty
--- providers
---- sdf
---- shp
---- oracle
- branches
- tags

-----Original Message-----
From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Mateusz
Loskot
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 3:23 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: Re: [fdo-internals] PSC: Interesting Conundrum

Robert Bray wrote:
> Ok, so the next step is figuring out what the repository should look
> like. Trying to avoid as much pain as possible I'd like to propose
> something like:
> 
> /fdo    - Repository
> /trunk
>  /fdodev
>   /fdo
>   /thirdparty
>   /utilities
>   /providers
>    /sdf
>    /shp
>    /...
> /branches
>  /3.2.x
>   /fdodev
>    ...
>
> Other ideas or suggestions welcome of course.


What about a little modification?

- trunk
-- fdo
--- core
--- utilities
--- thirdparty
--- providers
---- sdf
---- shp
---- oracle
- branches
- tags


So, there is the 'fdo' module that holds everything what makes FDO.
Next, if reasonable, we could add 'fdotools' module this way:

- trunk
-- fdo
-- fdotools


Cheers
-- 
Mateusz Loskot
http://mateusz.loskot.net
_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals