[fdo-internals] PSC Motion: Repository Merge

[Robert Bray]

If SVN can branch without the folder, then I am happy to live without it.

Bob

Jason Birch wrote:
> How about something like this:
>
> /fdo
>  /fdo
>   /branches
>    /3.2.x
>     /core
>     /tools
>     /...
>   /trunk
>    /core
>    /tools
>    /thirdparty
>    /utilities
>    /providers
>      /sdf
>      /shp
>      /...
>
> Initially, the additional "fdo" level would be redundant.  However, this
> would mean that tools could be moved out into its own structure later,
> like:
>
> /fdo    - Repository
>  /fdo
>   /branches
>    /3.2.x
>   /trunk
>  /fdotools
>   /branches
>    /1.3.22
>   /trunk
>
> Other projects seem to be able to branch directly from trunk?
>
> http://svn.refractions.net/postgis/
>
> http://svn.refractions.net/geotools/
>
> Jason
>  
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Robert Bray
> Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 15:17
> To: FDO Internals Mail List
> Subject: Re: [fdo-internals] PSC Motion: Repository Merge
>
> I am also fine with that directory just being called fdo. I just want to
> make sure there is a folder there to create global branches from (e.g. a
> branch that applies to all of fdo). If we can do that without the
> folder, then I am happy to do away with it.
>
> Bob
> _______________________________________________
> fdo-internals mailing list
> fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals
>
>