[fdo-internals] Trac Website

[Frank Warmerdam]

Folks,

I'm in favor of merging the drupal site contents into Trac and
making that our face.  I find the current split confusing for
a rather developer oriented thing like FDO.


Zac Spitzer wrote:
> My only concern is that sometimes the osgeo trac grinds to a halt,
> while the drupal
> seems to be pretty reliable...

I'm under the impression that part of the problem is our use of
sqlite backends for Trac and that it is easy to get database
locking issues.  We are contemplating using a real multi-user
database like postgres or ingres for Trac in the future to alleviate
this.

> I'm all for a single site, trac is a little hidden at the moment
> 
> z
> 
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Jason Birch <Jason.Birch at nanaimo.ca> wrote:
>> No comments on this?  Are there folks who are highly attached to the Drupal website?  Is it worth my time to write up an RFC for this?
>>
>> Jason
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org on behalf of Jason Birch
>> Subject: RE: [fdo-internals] Trac Website
>>
>> This would definitely require an RFC if there is enough buy-in for it, but I wanted to get some discussion going first.  I agree that it would be a good idea to list sections and sub-sections in the RFC to make the transition manageable.
>>
>> Jason
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> fdo-internals mailing list
>> fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 


-- 
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam at pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush    | Geospatial Programmer for Rent