[fdo-internals] RE: [fdo-users] OGR provider in 3.4.0

[Greg Boone]

So I figured out the issue. The GA build was run against the old tags/3.4.0 label. This was incorrect. The entire build needs to be re-posted.

Greg

From: fdo-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 10:09 AM
To: FDO Users Mail List
Subject: RE: [fdo-users] OGR provider in 3.4.0

Yes. There looks to be an issue with the GA build. The required OGR change was not included. I will have to do a re-build and re-post.

Greg

From: fdo-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Kenneth Skovhede, GEOGRAF A/S
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 3:32 AM
To: FDO Users Mail List
Subject: Re: [fdo-users] OGR provider in 3.4.0

r4525 does fix the problem.
However, the 3.4.0 GA still has the problem.
I have created ticket #509 describing the issue, and providing a fresh build that works.

Regards, Kenneth Skovhede, GEOGRAF A/S


Greg Boone skrev:

If you still have the issue, send us the test and we can examine it to try and determine the issue.



Greg



-----Original Message-----

From: fdo-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:fdo-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> [mailto:fdo-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Kenneth Skovhede, GEOGRAF A/S

Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 11:43 AM

To: FDO Users Mail List

Subject: Re: [fdo-users] OGR provider in 3.4.0



If GA means General Avalibility, and is the one posted on the website as

the official one,

I have used that one with the same results.



The actual text is from a run with my own

build, which did not include the fix.

I will try to apply the fix monday and observe the outcome.



Thank you for the response.



Regards, Kenneth Skovhede, GEOGRAF A/S







Greg Boone skrev:



This should be fixed in the 3.4.0 GA. Refer to:



http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/ticket/498



Greg



-----Original Message-----

From: fdo-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:fdo-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> [mailto:fdo-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Kenneth Skovhede, GEOGRAF A/S

Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 7:34 AM

To: FDO Users Mail List

Subject: [fdo-users] OGR provider in 3.4.0



I am trying to use the OGR provider in MGE2010 and it fails with an

unclassified exception.



Digging a little with a custom build of the OGR provider, I can see that

it creates the OgrConnection object

through the CreateConnection API call.



Then without calling any methods on the object, it disposes the object

and returns the

unclassified exception.



The mapguide debug log shows this for "TestConnection":

Error: An unclassified exception occurred.

 StackTrace:

  - MgFeatureServiceHandler.ProcessOperation line 83 file

d:\build\testarossa_nightly\build_30.1\ent\os\server\src\services\feature\FeatureServiceHandler.cpp

  - MgOpTestFeatureSourceConnection.Execute line 100 file

d:\build\testarossa_nightly\build_30.1\ent\os\server\src\services\feature\OpTestFeatureSourceConnection.cpp





And this for a preview:

Error: An unclassified exception occurred.

 StackTrace:

  - MgFeatureServiceHandler.ProcessOperation line 83 file

d:\build\testarossa_nightly\build_30.1\ent\os\server\src\services\feature\FeatureServiceHandler.cpp

  - MgOpGetClasses.Execute line 105 file

d:\build\testarossa_nightly\build_30.1\ent\os\server\src\services\feature\OpGetClasses.cpp

  - MgServerDescribeSchema.GetClasses line 1527 file

d:\build\testarossa_nightly\build_30.1\ent\os\server\src\services\feature\ServerDescribeSchema.cpp







Since the DescribeSchema call fails without ever calling DescribeSchema

on the provider, I thought that the OGRProvider may be missing some

required methods.

I suspect that Rfc23 might be the cause:

http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/wiki/FDORfc23



This may be a MapGuide error, but I was hoping that someone from the FDO

team had tested the OGR provider with an application that uses

the new schema functions, or could give a hint towards the problem.



Thanks in advance.







_______________________________________________

fdo-users mailing list

fdo-users at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:fdo-users at lists.osgeo.org>

http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-users

_______________________________________________

fdo-users mailing list

fdo-users at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:fdo-users at lists.osgeo.org>

http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-users


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/fdo-internals/attachments/20090420/7e4fba3e/attachment-0001.html