[fdo-internals] RE: Random question

[Greg Boone]

As I mentioned in my previous email... since we are provider driven, I think the odds of multiple people sandboxing the same provider at the same time to be fairly low.

-----Original Message-----
From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Jason Birch
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 12:59 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: RE: [fdo-internals] RE: Random question

Primarily, being able to work on large changes without walking over
other developers doing the same.  In some of the other projects a
developer will have a set of changes on the back burner over a couple
releases; having their own sandboxes allows them isolation from the
trunk, with controlled pull-ups.

For GDAL, this allows Frank to maintain an independent branch for one of
the customers he supports. For MapGuide, this allows ADSK to maintain an
independent branch related to specific commercial release points.

http://svn.osgeo.org/gdal/sandbox/warmerdam/1.4-esri/

http://svn.osgeo.org/mapguide/sandbox/adsk/2.1/

Jason

-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Boone
Sent: March-06-09 9:48 AM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: RE: [fdo-internals] RE: Random question

I am not sure we need a sandbox per user. What is the benefit? 
_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals