[fdo-internals] RE: FDO RFC 48 - Polygon Vertex Order is ready for
leaf.li at autodesk.com
Mon Jul 12 21:06:14 EDT 2010
Thanks for your clarification. Yes. I think Oracle should be enforced too.
>Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 06:00:07 -0700 (PDT)
>From: Crispin_at_1Spatial <crispin.hoult at 1spatial.com>
>Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO RFC 48 - Polygon Vertex Order is
> ready for review.
>To: fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
>Message-ID: <1278939607633-5282779.post at n2.nabble.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>I think (clarification) that Oracle will indeed store SDO geometry with all
>sorts of geometric and validation errors (and FDO will retreive it).
>However, for spatial analysis to be carried out on the data the data must
>pass validation. This means that the Oracle provider(s) sit somewhere
>between needing enforcement and not.
>I would like to think that FDO had the capability to ensure that geometry
>was valid for Oracle as other processes (apart from visualisation or
>bounding box filter) may be required to operate between individual
>View this message in
>Sent from the FDO Internals mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the fdo-internals