[fdo-users] MPolygon <-> FDO

[Gavin Cramer]

Hello, Maksim.  Thanks for the quick reply.  Yes, I had found the DLL, but Visual Studio is not letting me add it as a reference for some reason.  It is not discoverable via "Add Reference", despite me adding its path to the list of reference paths.  It cannot be dropped in the solution explorer under the references either.  I'll poke at it again.

Gavin


-----Original Message-----
From: fdo-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Maksim Sestic
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 3:26 AM
To: fdo-users at lists.osgeo.org
Subject: RE: [fdo-users] MPolygon <-> FDO


Hi Gavin,

Managed AcDb MPolygon support is exposed through AcMPolygonMGD.dll which
sits in Asdk installation folder, e.g. C:\Program Files\Autodesk Map 3D
200x.

Regards,
Maksim Sestic



Gavin Cramer wrote:
>
> Hi, Dennis.   Being on vacation means that my time is my own.  Besides,
> this is a diversion from shovelling snow here in wintery Ottawa.  :-)
>
> Tessellating to a LineString seems like a bit much to get around this
> glitch.  I think that I can get the necessary environment operational to
> reproduce your problem.  I looked in the case file and found several
> versions of your project.  The first one built for me with simple path
> changes.  However, the most recent  version has a vsproj file appears to
> be missing the AcMPolygonMGD reference, which I am also having trouble
> adding.  My .NET skills are very rusty.  I'll let you know if I get that
> going later today.  I might need a patched file from you.
>
> Gavin
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fdo-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:fdo-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of djonio
> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 6:36 AM
> To: fdo-users at lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: RE: [fdo-users] MPolygon <-> FDO
>
>
> Gavin,
>
> I hesitated to respond yesterday since you are on vacation and I had to
> noodle through my approach to this issue anyway. For me your last post
> brought me closure on the current state of FDO and those "curvee
> thingees".
> However, I am still not sure of what approach I should take. I am leaning
> toward the good'ol, tryed and true linearstring approach. I have been
> doing
> that for a couple years now. (back then I think I used AGF ... whatever).
> I
> talked to my users yesterday and they are kinda' sorta' OK with an
> "emulated" arc approach. When a round-trip is needed they are willing to
> deal with those "mini-lines". I will have to build some test cases for
> them
> but from their perspective anything is better than the tedium that I put
> them through today ... maybe we take a little step instead of a big one.
>
> Sorry for that slight digression. I take your recommendation to heart and
> as
> time permits will look into the FDO component myself.
>
> You have a great vacation!
> dennis
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/MPolygon-%3C-%3E-FDO-tp15873165s18162p15975862.html
> Sent from the fdo-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> fdo-users mailing list
> fdo-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-users
> _______________________________________________
> fdo-users mailing list
> fdo-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-users
>
>

--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/MPolygon-%3C-%3E-FDO-tp15873165s18162p16022439.html
Sent from the fdo-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
fdo-users mailing list
fdo-users at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-users