[fdo-users] FW: PostGIS provider connection question

[Bruno Scott]

We would have to take care of a couple of things.

First : backward compatibility with existing postGIS connection. I think it
would be fairly easy to support both type of connection.

Second : Actually, the provider caches the full schema, caching a full
database could be a long process.

Third : Naming convention for tables. PostGIS provider actually return only
the table name whitout the schema. Supporting multi schema would meen to
return a schema.table type of name. This may be another backard
cimpatibility problems.

Of course all these concerns have solutions:)

Bruno
-- 
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/FW%3A-PostGIS-provider-connection-question-tp3225307p3268250.html
Sent from the FDO Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.