[FOSS-GPS] Single frequency static PPP

Michele Bavaro mic.bavaro at yahoo.co.uk
Thu May 8 13:21:17 PDT 2014


Hi,

1)Yes, RTKLIB uses NEO7P just fine

2) I know most of these:
http://gpsworld.com/a-comparison-of-free-gps-online-post-processing-services/
want dual frequency, but perhaps at least a couple will digest your 
single frequency-
I used this a few times:
http://www2.unb.ca/gge/Resources/PPP/OnlinePPPs.html
http://www2.unb.ca/gge/Resources/PPP/SubmitData.html

3) don't know
4) I am not sure I understand the question

Cheers,
Mic


On 08/05/2014 20:10, Paul wrote:
> [I apologize if an another version of this message appears]
>
> In an effort to locate my antenna I collect data with an LEA-6T that I 
> process with RTKLIB and send to CSRS-PPP.
>
> Last summer Tomoji TAKASU said:
>
>    u-blox 7 does not provide T-version of the module
>    at this moment.
>
>    RTKLIB requires T-version like LEA-5T or LEA-6T
>    to utilize raw pseudorange and carrier-phase.
>
> So
> 1) Is the problem with the -7 module the lack of fixed position or is 
> a -7P a suitable of raw data for RTKLIB?
> 2) Is anyone other than CSRS doing (free) single frequency static PPP
> 3) My CSRS estimate is ~ 0.2m offset from my RTKLIB average (and with 
> a much larger bounding box).  Is that expected?
> 4) I discard non PPP records from the .pos file.  Might this cause 
> issues with any downstream software?
>
> Is the best place for RTKLIB questions -- particularly given the fact 
> that I'm not really interested in kinematics.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This message is sent to you from FOSS-GPS at lists.osgeo.org mailing list.
> Visit http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss-gps to manage your subscription
> For more information, check http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS-GPS

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/foss-gps/attachments/20140508/6e0225fc/attachment.html>


More information about the FOSS-GPS mailing list