<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>That’s a great resource!<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Unfortunately, the period was approx. 12-4PM on Sept 23, 2014 (Eastern US) and 06 is actually tracking OK. 02, 05 and 25 are all showing 50 dBHz and yet not being used. Very strange.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>-Sean<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'> foss-gps-bounces@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:foss-gps-bounces@lists.osgeo.org] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Felipe G. Nievinski<br><b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, September 23, 2014 4:39 PM<br><b>To:</b> foss-gps@lists.osgeo.org<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [FOSS-GPS] High SNR Satellites not being used<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Maybe PRN06 was set unhealthy?<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>You didn't mention the tracking period.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Check the NANUs, e.g.:<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><<a href="http://celestrak.com/GPS/NANU/2014/nanu.2014057.txt">http://celestrak.com/GPS/NANU/2014/nanu.2014057.txt</a>><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal><i>CONDITION: GPS SATELLITE SVN67 (PRN06) WAS UNUSABLE ON JDAY 198 (17 JUL 2014) BEGINNING 0950 ZULU UNTIL JDAY 198 (17 JUL 2014) ENDING 1507 ZULU.</i><o:p></o:p></p></div></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Historical outages here:<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><<a href="http://adn.agi.com/SatelliteOutageCalendar/GPSHistoricalOutages.aspx">http://adn.agi.com/SatelliteOutageCalendar/GPSHistoricalOutages.aspx</a>><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'>-F.<o:p></o:p></p></div><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in'><p class=MsoNormal>Message: 1<br>Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 16:00:05 -0400<br>From: "Sean Hyde" <<a href="mailto:sean.a.hyde@gmail.com">sean.a.hyde@gmail.com</a>><br>To: <<a href="mailto:foss-gps@lists.osgeo.org">foss-gps@lists.osgeo.org</a>><br>Subject: [FOSS-GPS] High SNR Satellites not being used<br>Message-ID: <02ac01cfd768$f8740f40$e95c2dc0$@<a href="http://gmail.com" target="_blank">gmail.com</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br><br>Hey Guys,<br><br><br><br>I noticed today that despite some satellites having >40 dBHz (as reported in<br>RTKNavi), they are not green and are not being used. They are also not<br>marked as 'OK' in the RTKMonitor. Any idea why? I do not have any<br>specifically excluded in the 'Options' settings and I have the Elevation<br>Mask set to zero.<br><br><br><br>I've attached a screenshot of the SNR from RTKNavi (the Rover is inside a<br>building so that's why it is so low, but the base station is outside).<br><br><br><br>Thanks,<br><br>-Sean<br><br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/foss-gps/attachments/20140923/3d1b4cba/attachment.html" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/foss-gps/attachments/20140923/3d1b4cba/attachment.html</a>><br>-------------- next part --------------<br>A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>Name: High SNR.PNG<br>Type: image/png<br>Size: 31643 bytes<br>Desc: not available<br>URL: <<a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/foss-gps/attachments/20140923/3d1b4cba/attachment.png" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/foss-gps/attachments/20140923/3d1b4cba/attachment.png</a>><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>FOSS-GPS mailing list<br><a href="mailto:FOSS-GPS@lists.osgeo.org">FOSS-GPS@lists.osgeo.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss-gps" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss-gps</a><br><br>End of FOSS-GPS Digest, Vol 68, Issue 14<br>****************************************<o:p></o:p></p></blockquote></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></div></div></body></html>