<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7650.28">
<TITLE>[Foss4g2009] Re: [Foss4g2009-private] FOSS4G internet requirements for conference and workshops</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<P dir=ltr>><BR>> Conference Access<BR>> - Approximate number of
delegates that had personal laptops/PDA/smart<BR>> phones with WiFi?</P><FONT
size=2></FONT>
<P>lots! we expected more than the average (for SA) and we got it. More than
that - those with devices who came from home countries with cheap fast broadband
expected the same performance so it didn't take many to clog the system. Aussie
prob has cheaper rates but we had 'standard' supply and bought and additional
2MBs bandwidth which was adequate for basic requirements but not for intense
FOSS4G usage. </P>
<P>In SA we have a telecom monopoly and while the infrastructure is fine prices
are not, so it would have been prohibitive to provide 'developed world'
bandwidth. So we had less than a lot of foreigners expected but more than most
South Africans ever get. Which was good really as it was a dose of reality for
developers who want their systems to work in the 'developing world'. </P>
<P>it was an eye-opener for most newcomers to the FOSS scene, with the amount of
IRC, twitter, blogging, photo uploading, etc. going on. </P>
<P>some internet dependent activities suffered e.g. GeoDjango workshop which was
in a patchy wifi spot and the demo theatre - tea and lunch were heavy public
usage times so internet intensive demos slowed down. So unless you have
unlimited bandwidth, be aware of this. </P>
<P><BR>> - What was the connection speed?</P>
<P>2MBs + a few 64kBs packages.<BR>> - Was it shared, routed, or firewalled
in any way?</P>
<P>all I know it was on a VLAN, not firewalled, no password access<BR>> - How
much was downloaded/uploaded over the total event?</P>
<P>didn't keep track but could probably get it <BR>> - How big was the
coverage area? ie: did the session rooms have wireless<BR>> access or just
the exhibition area?</P>
<P>we had full wifi coverage throughout all FOSS4G areas of the CTICC = portions
of two floors + exhibition hall + auditorium + open space and hallways. <BR>>
- How many WAP's were utilized?</P>
<P>I think it was 6: 2 in exhibition hall, one in auditorium, the rest dotted
around <BR>><BR>> Workshop Access<BR>> - For the workshop PC's what is
going to be installed/used on those<BR>> computers<BR>> - Will there be
any internet based activities going to be taking place<BR>> ie:
webcasting etc<BR>></P>
<P>all workshop PCs (100), internet cafe (3), demo theatre PCs (2), LOC
office(1), speaker prep room (1) and one or two others were cabled in.</P>
<P>exhibitors used wifi - if they wanted cable it was at their own expense. </P>
<P>we didn't have enough bandwidth to support any web/screen/podcasting.
<BR></P>
<PRE>This message is intended for the addressee only.
Information and attachments in this e-mail may contain confidential, proprietary, or legally privileged information.
If you are not the intended recipient, or responsible for delivery of the message to the intended recipient,
any disclosure, copying, distribution, or any action taken is prohibited and may be unlawful,
and could result in a claim against you.
</PRE></BODY>
</HTML>