The overview schedule online shows the AGM running at the same time as BoF on Wed 21st. However the detailed day plan has just the AGM, with the BoF's being run on Thurs 22nd.<div><br></div><div>As BoF are self organising by providing rooms on both evenings perhaps the organisers of the BoF's can make the call?<br>
<div><br></div><div>Even if they do run concurrently I'm unsure in practice how much dilution would happen? I think one of the original reasons for pushing the AGM to earlier in the week was to try an attract delegates who may be leaving Sydney late Friday afternoon or Friday evening. This may well be the case for many local delegates. Having the option for these local delegates to attend the AGM is beneficial IMO as it gives them the opportunity to get a feel for the operational aspects of OSGeo or indeed </div>
<div><br></div><div>This said I'm happy to move the AGM - It's your call Tyler<br clear="all"><br>Simon<br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2009/9/19 Tyler Mitchell (OSGeo) <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tmitchell@osgeo.org">tmitchell@osgeo.org</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Sorry to bring it up again, but now that I'm digging into the schedule,<br>
I'm trying to understand why we moved the AGM from Friday after closing<br>
ceremonies to Wednesday at same time as BoFs. I think it would be good<br>
to move it back so we don't dilute the BoFs and instead gives those who<br>
are still around something to attend after. Or was there some other<br>
reason it got moved?<br>
<br>
Tyler<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Foss4g2009 mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Foss4g2009@lists.osgeo.org">Foss4g2009@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2009" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2009</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div>