<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Arnulf Christl <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:arnulf@osgeo.org">arnulf@osgeo.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div><div></div><div class="h5">Lorenzo Becchi wrote:<br>
...<br>
<br>
</div></div>1 a) (someone local should do this)<br></blockquote><div><br><br>agreed, if nobody comes from this list I'll post on OSGeo-es<br><br> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
1 b) I enthusiastically volunteer to join and support this group<br>
<br></blockquote><div><br>bravo!<br> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
2) We can probably fill twice that number. Many have booked more than<br>
just one workshop. Paul Ramsey even suggested to have the most<br>
frequented workshops run twice so that people have a chance to attend<br>
both even if they run in parallel. Is there a chance of getting two days<br>
of workshop rooms or more than just 5 rooms?<br>
<br>
I believe someone already suggested dropping the tutorials, is that<br>
correct? They seem to interfere both with workshops and regular<br>
presentation sessions and they are almost the same amount of work as are<br>
the full scaled workshops.<br>
<br></blockquote><div><br><br>If tutorials are the same of labs I was thinking they are a good idea for the public.<br><br>2 days of workshops seem pretty complicated.<br>We can reach 1.5 days (monday morning to tuesday morning) I guess.<br>
it will allow 15 sessions in total.<br><br>lorenzo<br></div></div><br>