subsidizing?<br>there are profit margins for every price. we've been checking it with Grupo Pacifico.<br><br>lorenzo<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Paul Ramsey <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pramsey@cleverelephant.ca">pramsey@cleverelephant.ca</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">So is the conference-only price 130E (290E full - 160E workshops<br>
only)? These look really low. How have they been chosen? The students<br>
price looks low enough that we're actually subsidizing them: the cost<br>
of their food + tshirts/bags + other per-person costs would exceed<br>
their price. The workshops price should reflect the entire cost of the<br>
workshops day plus a healthy profit -- workshops are greatly in<br>
demand, price them accordingly.<br>
<br>
P.<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 4:52 AM, Lorenzo Becchi <<a href="mailto:lorenzo@ominiverdi.com">lorenzo@ominiverdi.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> here is the plan of prices for FOSS4G2010:<br>
> <a href="http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_2010_Subscriptions" target="_blank">http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_2010_Subscriptions</a><br>
><br>
> we have the doubt about the max age for students.<br>
> we are keen to choose 25, is there any objection?<br>
><br>
> I've choosen to say that we will have a day of workshops and if, later on,<br>
> we see that we can do half day more I think nobody will complain. am I<br>
> wrong?<br>
><br>
> lorenzo<br>
><br>
</div></div>> _______________________________________________<br>
> Foss4g2010 mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Foss4g2010@lists.osgeo.org">Foss4g2010@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2010" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2010</a><br>
><br>
><br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br>