<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<br>
En/na Judit Mays ha escrit:
<blockquote cite="mid:4BCBFFBC.4080208@lat-lon.de" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hello dear conference organisers,
catching up on the abstract selection: what has been decided for how the
selection process for general track shall work?
Now that submission deadline has passed is there a vote going on
somewhere? Who is taking part?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<tt>Dear Judit,<br>
<br>
All submitted papers will be reviewed by the members of the
scientific committee[1] who are in charge to ensure the quality of the
conference. They will accept (or not) submitted papers according to
their knowledge and expertise and they will </tt><tt>rank the
abstracts according to the Quality/Interest for the Conference.<br>
<br>
At the same time, we are planning to implement a public voting system.
Volker first and Paul offered his time and an application for the
foss4g2010 (thanks, both of you!</tt><tt>!) so, we are deciding how to
proceed to make this idea a reality.<br>
<br>
We will keep you informed.<br>
Best,<br>
<br>
Lluís<br>
<br>
[1] <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://2010.foss4g.org/scientific.php">http://2010.foss4g.org/scientific.php</a><br>
</tt>
<blockquote cite="mid:4BCBFFBC.4080208@lat-lon.de" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
Kind regards,
Judit
Lluís Vicens schrieb:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi Volker and Cameron,
Next Monday we have a meeting in Barcelona. We will discuss about this
issue and i will let you know our thoughts and decision. BTW, could you
explain us a little bit more about your script and how it could be
implemented before April 15th?
Cheers,
Lluís
En/na Volker Mische ha escrit:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I should have written the "why" more explicitly. People don't (or less
likely) complain when they know somebody put some thoughts in Abstract
selection and that it wasn't just two buddy's making it out while having
a beer.
Cheers,
Volker
Volker Mische wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi,
is there already information about the Abstract selection of the general
(non-academic) track available? The point of this mail is not to discuss
how the selection should be, but rather that it should be transparent
how the selection process works. I don't mean that it needs to be
transparent why someone was rejected, but only how the process was that
lead to the rejection.
I hope my intent was roughly understandable. And some people might even
understand why I think that this process needs to be transparent :)
Cheers,
Volker
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
</pre>
<pre wrap="">
<hr size="4" width="90%">
_______________________________________________
Foss4g2010 mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Foss4g2010@lists.osgeo.org">Foss4g2010@lists.osgeo.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2010">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2010</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>