[Foss4g2011] Re: [Foss4g2011-private] Re: Bunch of procrastinators:)

Daniel Kastl daniel at georepublic.de
Mon Apr 18 20:47:39 EDT 2011


2011/4/19 Tyler Mitchell <tmitchell at osgeo.org>

> On 2011-04-18, at 2:42 PM, Peter Batty wrote:
>
> > Paul Ramsey is the man behind the online voting system, I'm pretty sure
> he told me it includes randomizing the display order. Though a potential
> future enhancement would be to have some sort of weighting for those who
> submit earlier, to try to encourage everyone not to wait until the last day
> :).
>
> It's a neat idea to bring in abstracts sooner, as long as submitters know
> there is that parameter.  Wouldn't be too fair this year would it, nor would
> it help guarantee the best quality program at this point in time at
> least._______________________________________________



Does it make any difference for the program committee if an abstract is
submitted early or late? You have to wait for the last submission day
anyway.
I doubt that the quality of an abstract is related to the submission day.
It's probably more the every-year-the-same presentations that are the early
ones ;-)

Daniel








>  Foss4g2011 at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2011
>



-- 
Georepublic UG & Georepublic Japan
eMail: daniel.kastl at georepublic.de
Web: http://georepublic.de
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/foss4g2011/attachments/20110419/511dc710/attachment.html


More information about the Foss4g2011 mailing list